520 Comments
User's avatar
Patrick's avatar

I’m gonna make them an offer they can’t understand.

Expand full comment
Jack Mahoney's avatar

I'm going to make them an offer I can't understand.

Expand full comment
Russ's avatar

For Trump's team, you set a really low bar.

Expand full comment
The Coke Brothers's avatar

I'm going to make them an offer that only maga can understand, it's big, beautiful, amazing.

Expand full comment
ElderlyLoudCatWomyn's avatar

I'm gonna make them an offer maga THINKS they can understand, but can't because the offer makes no sense.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

It's gonna be yuuuuuuuuuuuggggggeeeee!

Expand full comment
Pete Gorton's avatar

Biggly - with covfefe!

Expand full comment
Owen S.'s avatar

Imma maemnoffa they canunnastan.

Expand full comment
Carlos De Leon's avatar

Covfefe!

Expand full comment
Rainer Dynszis's avatar

Which Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent explained on ABC's This Week, triumphantly: "In Game Theory, it's called strategic insecurity. So you're going to tell the other person that probably everyone is laughing at the US, and this has to stop. And nobody's better at showing this kind of insecurity than President Trump."

Expand full comment
Vito Rasenas's avatar

Doesn't have to tell the other person everyone is laughing at him, everyone is laughing at Trump. Friggin' Keystone Cop administration.

Expand full comment
Rainer Dynszis's avatar

Sorry for being unclear, I've tried to correct it :)

Expand full comment
Vito Rasenas's avatar

It's unclear because Bessent is using pretzel logic to infer Trump is playing multidimensional chess, while Trump is like an unruly infant turning over the chessboard

Expand full comment
Ethereal fairy Natalie's avatar

It's the pigeon playing chess analogy, no matter how great you play, the pigeon knocks over the pieces, shits on the board, and struts around like he "won".

Expand full comment
Pete Gorton's avatar

Comment of the week!

Expand full comment
Tony D's avatar

I think it still needs a rewrite - Reading it, I felt like I did the first time I watched "The Matrix" - there is something interesting there but I can't figure out what it is.

Expand full comment
Rainer Dynszis's avatar

I'm not sure that something's there. If so, it's probably shallower than you think :) Scott Bessent did in fact say something similar, praising Trump's "strategic uncertainty," probably confusing it with "strategic ambiguity":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hTD-yQ8mzw&t=156s

If found this amusing and tried mangling it some more.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

You get credit for trying, but it's already so convoluted to begin with you really couldn't possibly mangle it anymore. Unless you let Karoline Leavitt try to explain it. She's an expert logic mangler.

Expand full comment
Patrick's avatar

Game Theory? I thought Trump was more of a quantum gravity expert. What topics does he NOT understand??

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

It doesn't really matter because whatever he doesn't understand he just invents.

Expand full comment
Rainer Dynszis's avatar

Like relationships among humans.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Always transactional. No exceptions.

Expand full comment
Maya J's avatar

Yeah sure that’s it Scott

Expand full comment
chris lemon's avatar

I can only hope that this isn't an actual quote from Bessent. There is no way this ends up in anything short of a fiasco.

Expand full comment
Rainer Dynszis's avatar

LOL. Poe's law at work. For the sake of clarity, the actual quote from Bessent on

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hTD-yQ8mzw&t=156s is a tiny bit different, but not much:

"In game theory, it's called strategic uncertainty. So, you're not going to tell the person on the other side of the negotiation where you're going to end up. And nobody's better at creating this leverage than President Trump."

Expand full comment
chris lemon's avatar

Game Theory? It's more like in "Blazing Saddles" where Cleavon Little threatens to shoot himself, only not funny.

https://youtu.be/o7Q4fM5y_1I

Or like inviting everyone into an elevator for a gang fight, using hand grenades.

Expand full comment
John Patzakis's avatar

This is, without hyperbole, the worst possible strategy when you are taking a sledgehammer to intricate, long established global supply chains and asking small US business to invest millions and larger companies hundreds of millions for new domestic manufacturing, Such extreme uncertainty is beyond insane and will crash the economy.

Expand full comment
Chuck Dickens's avatar

“I’ll shoot myself in the foot to prove to you how crazy I am!”

Expand full comment
ElderlyLoudCatWomyn's avatar

Uh Bessent should go back to economics 101. There is no such thing as strategic "insecurity" in game theory.

Expand full comment
Ruth Schepper's avatar

What?

Expand full comment
Lesley's avatar

😆

Expand full comment
nl's avatar

I’m going to make them offer me an offer I won’t accept.

Expand full comment
Barry M Bunes's avatar

That would be incredibly easy they don’t understand much

Expand full comment
J. Goerdt's avatar

That would include almost ANY offer!

Expand full comment
Jeffrey Mann's avatar

He will fold but claim victory. Easy call.

Expand full comment
Jeffrey Mann's avatar

He will also blame everyone else but himself. Lutnick, Navarro, maybe even Bessent, will take the fall. These people never ever learn.

Expand full comment
Marc R Hapke's avatar

https://meidasnews.com/news/scott-bessents-former-classmates-urge-him-to-stop-donald-trump. My feeling is that Bessent will probably be the first Cabinet member to fall. His friends are begging him to "act as “a voice of reason in the midst of this insanity.” There is no place in Trump 2.0 for a voice of reason.

Expand full comment
Sharlene Silva's avatar

He’s on my Cabinet Bingo card. I had Stefanik out first, although that doesn’t technically count.

Expand full comment
CFV's avatar

Bessent knows the words coming out of his mouth are wrong. You can see in his eyes the realisation that he has sold his soul and found out the price was not worth it.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

He's toast.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

Lately he's stopped blaming Zelinsky for Ukraine and started blaming Obama...

Expand full comment
Jay Morris's avatar

He should be blaming Paul Manafort

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

And Konstantin Kilimnik, Russian agent and Robin to Manafort's Batman.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Is he the one who came up with "Krasnov"?

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

I think that one goes back a couple of decades. The boyish, affable Kilimnik was supposed to be Manafort's and Gates' translator and fixer during the decade they worked to get Yanukovych elected president of Ukraine. I have wondered whether he was in fact Putin's Man in Kyev. Imagine a Batman comic in which it is revealed that Robin was running the show all along... .

Expand full comment
bitchybitchybitchy's avatar

Donald,when the polls all show your approval rating dipping below 50%, when the WSJ is commenting critically about your policies, maybe the problem IS you, rather than those paid lefty operatives.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Rupert needs to tell it on Fox, don’t hold your breath…

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

The WSJ is telling it like it is... .

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

What magat reads the WSJ

Expand full comment
jcd's avatar

SOP FOR TRUMP

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

You mean the guillotine?

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Interestingly, they're all to blame.

Expand full comment
chris lemon's avatar

Every single person in the Trump admin has a bus with their name on it ready for them to be thrown under. It's how Trump rolls.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Apr 30
Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Begone impersonator spam bot.

Expand full comment
Timothy Samuel Whitworth's avatar

I don't think he's emotionally capable, this is his second term, the real one. I think he'll just sit there, doing nothing, unless or until a *really* bad idea gets into his head.

Even Trump's not dumb enough to invade Canada, is he?

Expand full comment
bitchybitchybitchy's avatar

With Trump one can never write any possibility off

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

It would conflict with his plan to send the military into the cities to put down opposition unrest. Especially if half the military would balk and say "f**k off Trumpkopf, we're not doing either of those things!"

Expand full comment
First 100 days were disaster's avatar

Military coups are scary and awful, but in this case it may be the lesser of two evils.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

I'm guessing your Canadian? Don't be so sure of that, if he successfully conquers us militarily - and I highly doubt he'd be able to, or even dare attempt it - he'd be more emboldened to pursue Canada than before. Be careful what you wish for.

Expand full comment
First 100 days were disaster's avatar

I'm saying the military may come out to overthrow Trump instead of following his unconstitutional orders. Alas, we may be better off for it.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Ahhh, well that's different! Yes, that could potentially work. But I'd prefer a political and legal solution. We're almost guaranteed a blue tsunami in 2026 at this point, in both chambers. In the meantime, I'm going out there to tomorrow's May Day rally, with sign in hand.

//

It's a great reminder of the imperative that we continue to Rise! Resist! ✊✊✊

May Day is the next nationwide rally, be there or be square!

We need 3.5% or the population, or around 12,000,000 people to be present. So bring all your friends and families, bring your pets. Spread the word as far and wide as possible.

Expand full comment
Pete Gorton's avatar

The "military" swears allegiance to the Constitution, not the Commander-in-Nappy.

Expand full comment
Dwight Homer's avatar

I worry about what happens when we invade Greenland!

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

I don't think we will. As it is, Thursday's demonstrations are going to be even bigger and better than April 5 and April 19.

It's a great reminder of the imperative that we continue to Rise! Resist! ✊✊✊

May Day is the next nationwide rally, be there or be square!

We need 3.5% of the population, or around 12,000,000. We've already been halfway there, let's go the rest of the way! Bring all your friends and family and spread the word as far and wide as possible.

//

Don't let up folks, it's working:

Boycott TE卐LA! Boycott Swastikar!

Short TE卐LA! Short Swastikar!

Boycott 卐tarlink!

Boycott 卐/Twitter!

Curb your DOGE!

https://generalstrikeus.com/strikecard

https://www.fiftyfifty.one/

https://indivisible.org/

https://handsoff2025.com/

https://www.teslatakedown.com/

https://www.riseandresist.org/

https://thirdact.org

Expand full comment
Robert Gustafson's avatar

Like *Family Ties*’s Alex Keaton?

Expand full comment
Matty's avatar

Folding might not help at this point - neither the EU or China is going to be eager to put themselves in danger of US insanity again

Expand full comment
Raul Ramos y Sanchez's avatar

"Why didn't Amazon do this when the Biden administration hiked inflation to the highest level of 40 years?" White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at a White House briefing.

Why? Because the inflation was caused by stress to international supply networks caused by Covid. It was not Biden's arbitrary decisions that caused the inflation. Amazon and every other sensible business entity knew that.

Expand full comment
EUWDTB's avatar

Leavitt is such a horrible, horrible person. She might be too young to never have been brainwashed in the first place, but still. In a job like hers, how could she not know that the post-pandemic inflation was GLOBAL, and precisely due to the global shutdown?

It's basic economics. When demand remains the same and supply goes down, prices go up, since companies still need to pay their employees and shareholders. This IS how capitalism works. You can't be against communism AND blame PRIVATE capitalist decisions like that on a sitting president who had nothing whatsoever to do with it - neither did any other government in the world, at the time.

Expand full comment
George Patterson's avatar

You have to have a brain to be brainwashed.

Expand full comment
William Moore's avatar

George, LMAO right now........

Expand full comment
EUWDTB's avatar

FYI: all human beings have a brain ;-)

Expand full comment
George Patterson's avatar

So Leavitt is a very large amoeba.

Expand full comment
Edwin Callahan's avatar

That’s an insult to all decent amoebas, large and small.

Expand full comment
EUWDTB's avatar

To end a problem, you need to first understand its causes. Indulging in insults like that makes understanding impossible. And their history proves that if we allow ourselves to dehumanize others, things tend to not end well (for them and for us).

Expand full comment
Edwin Callahan's avatar

The cause of the problem, in this case Leavitt, is that she is an utter failure as a human being. And she worked to be that way. Don’t you understand? She is what she wants to be. Why should I ever forgive her?

Expand full comment
Marc R Hapke's avatar

Facts do not matter in the MAGA world.

Expand full comment
sallie reynolds's avatar

Actually, they know all this - but they have bought the mantra: tell a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.

Expand full comment
EUWDTB's avatar

That's what is called "having been brainwashed", THE prerequisite for installing a fascist government "democratically" (= through elections).

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

Shhhh! You can't say that. It sounds so much better to blame Biden.

Expand full comment
Manohar's avatar

Oh they know they're lying. They just don't care. All they want to do is cater to the MAGA crazies.

Expand full comment
Jane D's avatar

easy answer- she’s dumb

Expand full comment
George Patterson's avatar

Basic economics is more complicated than that. When prices go up, demand goes down. When demand goes down, companies lay off employees and shareholders get antsy. Demand will only remain nearly the same for necessities; even then, some people will start diets that they had not planned on starting.

Expand full comment
EUWDTB's avatar

It depends on the type of goods. During the pandemic, ALL prices went up, including groceries. And demand for groceries is not "flexible" (the same number of people will continue the same amount of food to survive). And for things like cars, when supply goes down prices automatically go up, which indeed lowers demand, but private companies couldn't care less about lower demand. What they need is the same amount of income even when they cannot put as many products in the market as usual.

Expand full comment
Lee Peters's avatar

In other words, price elasticity. Goods and services have different elasticities. Micro 101.

Expand full comment
Bruce Olsen's avatar

What a stunningly oversimplified take on the situation. But that's mainstream economics for ya.

Expand full comment
EUWDTB's avatar

Please give us the complicated take on the situation?

Expand full comment
NSAlito's avatar

Oh, you and your faint-cy economical education!

Expand full comment
Jeff's avatar

I think she's great at making up propaganda on the fly and sounding like she believes it. Perfect for the job.

Expand full comment
Marc R Hapke's avatar

I disagree that she's not smart. It takes a certain type of intelligence to do what you described. I don't like it and I think people like Leavitt & Stephen Miller are dangerous, but they are in control for now.

Expand full comment
Vito Rasenas's avatar

She's not horrible, she's just a drone parroting the bs she's told.

Expand full comment
Bruce's avatar

no she is horrible. DO NOT let any of these criminals off the hook like that.

Expand full comment
sallie reynolds's avatar

That's horrible!

Expand full comment
bitchybitchybitchy's avatar

Leavitt was born into and raised in the Catholic Church. She graduated from a private Catholic college and took a job in Trump's WH during his first term. She's a true believer.

Expand full comment
Pete Gorton's avatar

Come to think of it, where IS the Catholic Church while all this evil is festering? Similarly, the Episcopalians (sp?) and all the ...maga-churches? [Sorry, couldn't resist!]

Expand full comment
Maya J's avatar

She was hired to be a lying machine wearing a cross.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

I won’t ever accuse Leavitt of even an semblance of understanding or knowledge when it comes to disseminating economics, or any other meaningful issue, for the matter. However, let’s not be naive!

Leavitt knows exactly what’s she’s doing; winging it, just like the rest of the unqualified clown car and affirmative action hires.

The problem with flooding the zone with so much misinformation and lies, like these imbeciles are doing; it becomes impossible to manage the blowback when it starts to boomerang into their collective faces. IMHO…:)

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 29Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
skayen's avatar

Small correction: Melanoma.

Leavitt is 26 (dob 8.24.98); her husband/father is 58; sadly, they have a son. She was tRump's assistant press secretary at age 21 and previously served as tRump's speechwriter. She was a Fox so-called News intern when she was still in college on a softball scholarship. According to news reports, she has a "steady, unblinking" devotion to tRump.

Expand full comment
skayen's avatar

Apologies for the duplicate responses. I received message of a posting error, which accounts for my continued attempts. I don't know how to remove the duplicates and welcome any help.

Expand full comment
Frau Katze's avatar

You can delete comments. Use the three dots to the right of the comment.

Expand full comment
skayen's avatar

I tried several times and continue to get this message:

"Something went wrong"

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

A born in the wool believer. No Cassidy Hutchison here

Expand full comment
jcd's avatar

Really, what response did u expect from the bimbo???

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Meanwhile, Amazon just reversed course after being called “traitors” by Dear Leader!…:)

Expand full comment
Raul Ramos y Sanchez's avatar

Just confirmed your comment, Robert. The weasels at Amazon now deny they ever intended to display the cost of tariffs.

https://www.axios.com/2025/04/29/tariffs-amazon-prime-day-sellers-report

Expand full comment
Randy tenHaaft's avatar

Comrade Bezos caved after Dear Leader threatened to take away his yacht……

Expand full comment
oz2025's avatar

More likely his Blue Origin contracts

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Predictably.

Expand full comment
Curt Gilker's avatar

This was only for Amazon Haul, a Temu knockoff. Would have been symbolic at best, but even then, why not? Just f*cking estimate it, they know the tariff percentage!

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Bozo Bezos is a world class woos.

Expand full comment
William Moore's avatar

See my recent post, the word pathetic certainly applies to Leavitt too, she may be young and nice-looking, but she is mean too, just like Don likes his people to be, and in the end, just pathetic. I would hate to know what the future holds for this youngster, but it won't be nice.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Beauty may be skin deep but ugliness goes all the way through.

As for what the future holds for her, hopefully jail time, along with the rest of the King Krasnov Klown Kar.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Mean, like all who gravitate to him.

Expand full comment
Lisa Dekker's avatar

She’ll be gone soon. She’s not blonde.

Expand full comment
Allen Friedman's avatar

Another reason is that an inflation statistic is tied to general prices, not the cost of a specific item. Whereas a tariff is a specific tax calculated to the price of a SPECIFIC ITEM. Inflation of 3.3% doesn’t mean a Peloton costs 3.3% more. But a 100% tariff on an $82 item means it costs the buyer $164.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

They know, they lie

Expand full comment
John Patzakis's avatar

I've never understood why Democratic party leadership and mainstream economists never made the case that authoritarian dictatorships are terrible for the economy, especially middle class Americans. All dictators are narcissists and sociopaths. You put one in control of the most powerful country in the world, without all the guardrails and adults in the room in place for Trump I, and this is what happens. So much of our economic strength is based upon the rule of law and the fact that we were not previously a dictatorship.

Expand full comment
Stephen Fisher's avatar

Would it have mattered? Who is listening? All they hear is the equivalent of "what about her emails?"

Expand full comment
Marliss Desens's avatar

I recommend this article in The Atlantic, as Democrats plan their strategy:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-short-circuiting-of-the-american-mind/ar-AA1DPDPu?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=57fe707581e941c89b83afdeeb9a6087&ei=6

We need the facts, but facts do not convince most people, so we need the emotional emphasis and lots of hammering home how Trump's policies hurt people.

Expand full comment
chris lemon's avatar

Unfortunately a democracy can not exist in an environment where facts do not matter. If the DEMs ever rid the US of Trump and his minions, they must address the issues of pervasive social media propaganda and the lack of knowledge of basic civics and economics amongst the electorate. If they dont, the cycles of chaos will continue until a more competent dictator gets into power and ends elections.

Expand full comment
Marliss Desens's avatar

Yes, facts matter, but we need to acknowledge the emotional component.

Expand full comment
chris lemon's avatar

The DEMS are truly appallingly bad at campaigning in general. I think they should concentrate on facts first, but they can throw the emotional factor of "are you tired of being lied to and shafted by the Oligarchy" into every pitch they make.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

We need bumper sticker slogans - like the GOP has been using since "the trickle down effect" and "welfare queens". Except our bumper stickers will be >truthful<.

Expand full comment
Rita Hayen's avatar

They have, but the mainstream media doesn't report it, and conservative media calls the democrats liars. The few times the news media has written about these issues, it's on page 25, under a larger article about Trump with his photo. Rarely does this message make the front page. Why? Because the Trump controversy sells papers (tv ads) and he's everywhere. Dr. Krugman wrote editorials for the NYT about these issues during the election. Thankfully he's still writing about it.

Expand full comment
tempprofile's avatar

When Congress raises the debt ceiling by $4T with all GOP votes (excluding Rand Paul) within a week the NYT will be non ironically quoting people that voted for it when they talk about how terribly concerned they are about the deficit. And how this means we must cut Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid (what is left of it) right NOW! It's not the NYT's job to call them liars. That would have been PK's job,but his editor would have transformed lie into "somewhat inconsistent".

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Technically speaking, aside from profiteering and all that, it very much is the NYT's job to call them liars. That's the whole point of freedom of the press - to hold officials feet to the fire. Unfortunately, that same freedom also provides them with a wide berth to shirk their responsibility.

Expand full comment
Ethereal fairy Natalie's avatar

They abdicated the right to tell the truth, and call out the lies, around the time of Bush's Iraq war.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Exactly, but the 2000 election had a stink about it that nobody noticed

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Yeah - the first Bush/Iraq war. They had a tiny two paragraph article buried in the obit's section that the day before Iraq invaded Kuwait, the Iraqi ambassador asked our ambassador - I don't recall her name anymore - what we'd do in response if they did invade.

Our ambassador told a NYT reporter that she was >instructed< to say we'd do nothing. The next day, Iraq invaded, and King Bush I came out with his "this will not stand" - as if he didn't have it already planned out.

Expand full comment
JDinTX's avatar

Prescott Bush (of Coup of 1933) sure produced some traitors

Expand full comment
Pete Gorton's avatar

Hmm, that's a vexed question. I prefer my "news reporters" to report, and allow me to make a judgement. If subsequently - or consequently - they wish to offer an opinion, then it's Op-Ed time...

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Fact checking falls under the reporting category - it's not mere opinion.

Expand full comment
Ethereal fairy Natalie's avatar

👆👆👆🎯Bingo, the dems speak facts, and the corporate media writes another sanewashing piece about tRump's insane ramblings.

Expand full comment
LisaB's avatar

Did you even follow the last election? The Democrats said all that and everyone said, no one cares about Democracy.

Expand full comment
John Patzakis's avatar

I followed the last election closely. The Dems talked a lot about defending Democracy as an abstract ideal, which is fine, but never made the connection to our economic well being.

Expand full comment
Scott de Brestian's avatar

Harris pounded the cost of Trump's tariffs to the American people endlessly.

Expand full comment
John Patzakis's avatar

Tariffs and authoritarianism aren't necessarily connected. Biden used targeted tariffs as part of a well-thought out broader policy. My point is that when you threaten Greenland, Canada, suspend the rule of law, and send legal residents to Gulags in El Salvador, you cause great damage to our national brand, which causes extensive damage to our economy.

Expand full comment
Rainer Dynszis's avatar

Yeah, well... then it's the Democrats' inexcusable mistake that they didn't cast Antony Starr a.k.a. Homelander for the role of the POTUS.

Expand full comment
Lee Peters's avatar

Project 2025 read like a blueprint for Franco’s Spain to me, and I wondered last year why there wasn’t a push to show how much worse off Spain was economically than other European nations when he died in 1975. Then the Vance contingent started touting Franco’s Spain as desirable. If a faction of voters actually want a religious dictatorship, Democrats warning against one would have just encouraged that faction even more. Democrats could have thrown a wrench into the juggernaut by encouraging sectarianism, since US Christians are divided into many different denominations while Spain is overwhelmingly Catholic. Democrats refused to play hardball and use this card, though, and here we are. Breaking the alliance between the whites supremacist Protestants and the anti-reproductive rights Catholics that formed in the late 1970s would have gone a long way to preventing our current situation.

Expand full comment
John Patzakis's avatar

All Kamala had to do was point out the dismal economies and extremely high inflation rates (5x of the US) in Russia, Turkey and Hungary, all run by dictators that Trump wanted to emulate.

Expand full comment
Phil's avatar

Does the MAGA cult even know that the plan was to emulate the authoritarian countries? As far as I can tell they think Trump is only going after immigrant criminals, cutting waste fraud and abuse, correcting "unfair" trade agreements and undoing Biden's illegal EO's.

The right wing media doesn't report on the reality behind his actions, just the press releases the administration puts out touting their (imagined) successes.

The right has created an media ecosphere so dense that reality is incapable of penetrating the MAGA skulls.

Expand full comment
Robert Gustafson's avatar

Fortunately, they aren’t a majority of Americans—only about 45%. Kamala needed only to do 2% better across the board to win the PV, and just 2% more in 3 states—the ones that decided the previous 2 elections—to win the EV. The fate of the country lies in the 7% or so of “swing voter” Americans!

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

The hardcore MAGAnuts can't think beyond "own the libs", at least not without pulling a muscle in their puny Schlitz and Kool-Aid addled brains.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Not to mention North Korea.

Expand full comment
Robert Gustafson's avatar

I think Americans are too insular to care enough about the economies of other nations, much less see if there are policy lessons there for us. People have to *see* it at home to believe it.

Expand full comment
RCThweatt's avatar

Could go further, and say no one has tried to blow up a government in the English speaking world like this since radical Catholics tried to quite literally in 1605. Because it is, in fact, true.

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

Probably b/c there won’t be a middle class if we end up under a dictatorship.

Expand full comment
Jeff's avatar

I hate to say it but the counter example is China. They have problems, but with an authoritarian government they moved into markets and made investments in education, infrastructure, and industries that put them on top in many sectors. We have a feckless Congress and only with reconciliation did Democrats push through programs to increase strategic investments by government. The marketplace goes where the profits are and not necessarily national interest.

Expand full comment
BANETH Jean's avatar

Trye. And also on the idea that, o the whole, the US wants other countries and othr people to do better, in economic terms and also in political terms. By halting most AID operations as well as Voice of America Trump killed that idea of the US.

Expand full comment
Marc R Hapke's avatar

Every day Trump proves that #ETTD. I hope the US is the exception to that.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

“Hence the stunning defeat for Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative leader (who lost his own seat in Parliament.)”

First off, how fitting that the leader of the opposition lost his seat in Parliament. Trump is the gift that keeps on giving to liberals and moderates; but only after he’s destroyed every positive thing in its wake.

That said Professor, you are 100% correct, Trump does everything in reverse. He claims he wants to take on China, so does he rally our allies to work on a way to apply pressure? Hell NO!

Instead, Trump manages to alienate them by enacting ludicrous tariffs; based on the most specious of justifications—Fentanyl, “our allies are mean to me, or are screwing us,” rinse, lather, repeat!

Furthermore, Trump’s claims he’s already made over 200 deals; ironic, since there are only 195 countries in the UN and the world. Perhaps, there are a few more islands inhabited by Penguins that we missed!

Additionally, I’ve read that Japan won’t do any deals that involve Trump causing China any pain—embargo’s or sanctions. And clearly, the Europeans are no longer playing nice or fearful of Trump. While they won’t confront Trump head on, they are definitely making deals under the table, which does not include the US. Our supply chains and trade partners are shrinking.

Bottom line: Trump has seriously managed to do what no other diplomat could accomplish in the last decade; bring both Japan and S. Korea knocking on China’s door; ready to make a deal. And ditto for Canada, Mexico, Great Britain and Australia.

If this is what winning looks like, I can’t wait to see what Trump’s definition of losing is! IMHO…:)

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

It killed me that when Trump made 10% the baseline for the whole world, there were 111 countries included with whom the US enjoys as trade surplus... .

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Except that island populated only by penguins. I think we're trade neutral with them.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

Yes. We give them fish and they give us National Geographic programs of equal value.

Expand full comment
Vito Rasenas's avatar

It all makes sense if you believe in Krasnov. Make Russia Great Again.

Expand full comment
Harry Hull's avatar

So far, this rather obvious explanation of the “Why” this administration is making so many self-inflicted wounds to this country isn’t getting the attention it deserves. See Naomi Klein’s latest in the Guardian.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

Losing is not in the narcissist lexicon. That's the problem.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Well put!…:)

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Well, he's winning. He's raking it in hand over fist, especially from $KingMAGAcoin, as is his family and friends. Just look at the haul Marjorie Taylor Greenbacks took from insider trading.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

True, but I was talking about about the rest of us. Remember when he used to say, “we’re going to win so much, you’re going to get tired of winning,” or something to that effect. That was my point…:)

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

I realize that. I was just using it as a springboard to mock him with.

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

You did an excellent job of articulating what I was thinking. Bravo Robert.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Thank you..:)

Expand full comment
Nenapoma's avatar

The title alone makes me want to read it

Expand full comment
thedeadcanary's avatar

Prof. Krugman wanted to go on vacation but they are pulling him back in...

Expand full comment
Leslie E. Henry's avatar

Portugal is a lovely place to be unable to work. Not sorry for Krugman. :-)

Expand full comment
Bob Bowden's avatar

Vinho Verde still tastes fine at room temperature

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

They cut the power to silence him!

Expand full comment
thedeadcanary's avatar

Thanks for the laugh!

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Next, he'll get accidentally run over by a herd of large animals running through the bike lane.

Expand full comment
Barry's avatar

The world has to stand strong against our bully President, so does Bezos and Amazon. Trump needs to be broken now!

Expand full comment
Sandy's avatar

Bezos is on Team Trump. We’ve boycotted Amazon, and it isn’t that hard. See https://www.reddit.com/r/EscapeAmazon/

Expand full comment
Donna's avatar

I’m boycotting Amazon too! Also, prime video, and Netflix. Buy local, and use the library!

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

I'd love to say that I'm boycotting Amazon - but I've never used them to begin with. I've been boycotting them from the beginning!

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

I thought Bezos had his head up trump’s ass. I think it is a wise decision to publish the cost of tarriffs. Might re-up our membership is he gets the hell out of the WaPo.

Expand full comment
Dr Jen Adjacent (Todd)'s avatar

Eventually even Bezos realized that sucking up to Trump only results in more sucking up. It’s amazing how someone can be so smart about building a company like Amazon, but can be so stupid as to not realize that bowing down to Trump is a slow escalator down to hell.

Expand full comment
Dr Jen Adjacent (Todd)'s avatar

I take it back. Per the WSJ, Bezos just caved, again. So he has NOT realized that sucking up will only lead to more sucking up. Hey Jeff Bezos, what’s it like to be Trumps jail cell bitch?

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

He has it jammed so far up he's bumping heads with Trumpkopf himself.

Expand full comment
Curt Gilker's avatar

Note that this is not across all Amazon, only applies to Amazon Haul. Never heard of it? No surprise, it is their Temo equivalent, not the primary one you were hoping it was.

Expand full comment
Jeff's avatar

Most of the stuff on Amazon is being sold by someone else. So Amazon doesn't know what tariffs they are paying (while ripping them off for the listing). I guess they could ask.

Expand full comment
Frau Katze's avatar

Trump calls Bezos as Amazon says no plan to show tariff price rises

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdxg7xpr2j0o.amp

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

I see now that Bezos re-shoved his head up his ass.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

But, Leslie, can they trust the offer? That’s the basic problem. Trump is TOTALLY untrustworthy. At 2 he cannot remember what he promised at 4. Look carefully at the face under the makeup and the eyes. Not much left.

Expand full comment
Ryan Collay's avatar

He’s consistent, clear and stupid…feral intelligence, maybe, and it’s amazing to watch want little was there shrivel as he snivels. Wormtongues, Stephen Miller, loopy people whispering into his ear to re-inflate his ego one more time. The dark riders, the ring wraiths, all with their gold ring binding them in the darkness…the answer is light and bleach!

Expand full comment
Ethereal fairy Natalie's avatar

I'll upvote a Tolkien reference anytime.

Expand full comment
Robert Gustafson's avatar

Where’s Gollum when you need him? *Who* is Gollum in this analogy?

Expand full comment
Ryan Collay's avatar

Gollum was court-Ted by the ring of power, even as a hobbit he was taken over the only the oath to throw himself in the fire stopped Frodo from the same fate! So in the Tolkien analogy he’s Erik, maybe, could do some good, on the the Fuax kids who could save us from the drugification of power politics.

But he and Frodo were sides of a coin…the savior is Sam, I think of him as Mayor Pete, smarter than you think, earnestly working. And with out whom the battle would have been lost!

The real question is who is Aragorn, quietly protector the Shire at Gandalf’s request for heir hidden purpose. MAGA is of course the orc/human hybrids made by Saruman and is smarter/scary Donny (we got lucky that Donny so feckless!), Stephen Miller is Wormtongue. The Seven ring-wraiths are the cabinet. Etc…

Expand full comment
Robert Gustafson's avatar

You mean Nine Ringwraiths?

Expand full comment
Ryan Collay's avatar

Yes the nine riders were human kings given rings, ‘in the darkness bind them.’ And they lived in the inter-world with no shape and could kill with their black breath, which Aragon could cure with his healing skills, and while it was said one could never be killed by a man they could, it turned out, be killed by a woman, and she did! But almost died in the process…she married the other son of Denathor and they became land stewards and gardeners putting aside arms and war. Gardening and healing were important themes, many of the men of Tolkien’s group had horrible injuries from WW I…including the horrible gases that become such a major part of Germanic’s chemical industry and were used in WWII to murder millions…too WOKE?! Sorry…

Expand full comment
Laura Morland's avatar

I have done my best to avoid looking at that man's face ever since November 5, 2016. (I'm serious -- for over eight years, I have been putting my hand over my computer screen whenever his orange head pops up.)

So, thank you for doing what I cannot. And I would take your word for it, but everyone who has pronounced Trump to be DOA has since been proven wrong. Remember the "low-energy" announcement of his canidacy at Mar-a-Lago in 2023? Many then predicted that he no longer had the taste, or the gumption, for campaigning.

Unfortunately, he proved them wrong.

Expand full comment
Essmeier's avatar

Look for the "Make America Kittens Again" Web browser plugin. It replaces most photos of Trump with pictures of kittens. It's not 100% accurate, but it works most of the time and it's available for multiple browsers.

Expand full comment
Laura Morland's avatar

Dear Essmeier,

Thank you so much for sharing MAKE AMERICA KITTENS AGAIN! It doesn't work with the New York Times, but it did with cnn.com and aljazeera.com (they popped up in a random test).

It's very relaxing to see a photo of a beautiful feline on my page. And I'm also happy that the photos are not only of kittens, but also of cats. (Not a fan of kittens, but I love cats. )

Expand full comment
Camille K. Hedrick's avatar

I can't stand to look at him either.

Expand full comment
Lee Peters's avatar

Me either, but it’s been longer than eight years. I couldn’t stand him being foisted upon us by the NY media back in the 1980s. Every community has its own version of Richie Rich, and the NY media insisted we all had to hear about theirs as well as having to put up with our own versions.

Expand full comment
Laura Morland's avatar

I agree. Even though I don't live in the NY area, he was still well-enough known to those who follow national news that I recall when the Atlantic did a long piece on his bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City, my reaction was, "Maybe we'll never have to hear about this guy again!"

How wrong I was.

Expand full comment
Robert Gustafson's avatar

Speaking of Richie Rich, where’s Cadbury when you need him?

Expand full comment
Robert Gustafson's avatar

Can’t stand his mean and whiny voice!

Expand full comment
Ethereal fairy Natalie's avatar

But although lazy, he is still a greed monster.

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

He looked really bad when he headed back to the WH from Rome didn’t he.

Expand full comment
Virginia Witmer's avatar

Yes. He looks worse and worse. A face watcher, I have watched his fall apart. And his eyes look meaner and meaner.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Porcine.

Expand full comment
Lance Khrome's avatar

"I run the country and the world", in his own words. *Primus inter pares*, or unmoored megalomaniac?

We report, you decide.

Expand full comment
Gerald Rogan's avatar

Trump is in charge of tariffs. He and his family owns large portion of a cryptocurrency company. See article in the NYT today. Crypto offers one the opportunity of unmitigated bribery.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Money for nothin' and your chicks for free.

Expand full comment
Robert Gustafson's avatar

Well said given our Dire Straits. What d’ya suppose’ll what when the cryptocurrency bill comes due (assuming that possible for a currency that can’t be used to buy anything)?!

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

All the suckers who traded currency for cryptocurrency will understand Kryptos is a Greek word for hidden. Kinda like a pea under a walnut shell sorta thing.

Expand full comment
EUWDTB's avatar

Exactly. My point too.

Expand full comment
Eric Greene's avatar

“I’d gladly pay you next Tuesday, for a hamburger today,” said Wimpy.

Expand full comment
Sean M Carlin's avatar

I hope that Donald Shitler and his team ink that deal with Madagascar as I was thinking about baking this weekend and I need some vanilla.

Expand full comment
Marc Paul DeFrancis's avatar

Just when I think we’ve hit bottom with Trump’s decisions, another trustworthy source, like Mr Krugman, explains how things are actually much worse. When a president is this toxic, impoverishment, isolation, and chaos are bound to follow.

Expand full comment
Robert Gustafson's avatar

My guess—don’t hold me to it—is that DJT’ll be so unpopular by 2028 that voters’ll elect *any* Democrat, no matter how demographically unconventional (i.e., woman, non-white), —similar to 2008. That of course assumes free and fair elections by then. The current trajectory points to a GOP rout (Dem wave—assuming the party gets a spine) next year, but even those elections seem like an eternity away!

Expand full comment
Smoot Carl-Mitchell's avatar

And Bezos thought he could placate Trump. A lot of our elites are really kind of dumb.

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

I think greedy

Expand full comment
Melinda Battaile's avatar

Trump is Fredo's stupid older brother that the family had tried to leave in Italy.

Expand full comment