550 Comments
User's avatar
Peter Eade's avatar

I'm in my 80's. I've seen lots of corruption over the years! This beats them all. I cannot do much but am determined to attend whichever protests that I am able to.

Expand full comment
Sheila M Cahill's avatar

Im 81 and no longer strong enough to stand up and walk for hours in these rallies. As a result I am extending myself financially a little beyond where I can be comfortable just to give to the right causes and keep the motion going.

Expand full comment
Penelope Lane's avatar

That's what I'm doing as well.

Expand full comment
Data Driven's avatar

In addition, I am going to websites of elected Senators and Reps and writing to them in order to share links to articles and data (including U.S. Gov't links) to remind them that we DO see through the gaslighting, lies, and deception.

This is a very interesting piece laying out a very intriguing hypothesis of tactics used or at least in the toolkit of allies, including Canada and Japan. Certainly raises awareness that the current regime is ill-equipped and unable to win a trade war. US needs to act fast to remove tariffs and halt trade war or we will be harmed more and long into the future.

see DEAN BLUNDELL Substack -- "Carney’s Checkmate: How Canada's Quiet Bond Play Forced Trump to Drop Tariffs" (you can search directly in Substack and for convenience I'm posting the link here: https://deanblundell.substack.com/p/carneys-checkmate-how-canadas-quiet).

To see the major foreign holders of US Treasury Securities, a search to the effect will bring up various Treasury.gov websites. This Treasury.gov one, titled, "Table 5: Major Foreign Holders of Treasury Securities", shows country-level data including Jan. 2025. (https://ticdata.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/tic/Documents/slt_table5.html)

There is CNBC reporting that Japan (and China) were selling US Treasuries, but this isn't necessarily proof that discussions during earlier EU, Canada, and Japan meetings and other bilateral conversations were the only or primary motivation for the sales. In addition, there is reporting in Canada by CBC which published the following: "Following the chaos in the bond market, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne and his Japanese counterpart, Katsunobu Kato, shared concerns about the U.S.'s slate of tariffs in a phone conference, according to the ministry. Canada is the current chair of the G7. The ministry says Canada is working with Japan and the European Union to maintain global stability in financial markets and the financial system."

Would be interesting if experts such as Professor Krugman (someone who travels in those circles) are able to confirm or refute specifics in the piece.

Expand full comment
Penelope Lane's avatar

I’m definitely going to use these links and I’m a big fan of Paul Krugman.

Expand full comment
Dennis Hui's avatar

I have some issues with Dean Blundell's piece; for example, the amount of US treasury held by Canada (per treasury link above) was actually higher at the end of Dec 2024 (378.8B) than end of Jan 2025 (350.8B). In fact, the 350.8B is less than the month end holdings of most of the previous year.

Likewise, Mr. Carney only became PM in Canada in mid March 2025 so it's unclear how much influence he had in all this. (It's certainly possible that he had given some advice to his predecessor.)

Does anyone know of any other sources corroborating some of the other statements in Blundell's piece?

Expand full comment
Data Driven's avatar

Dennis, thank you for these points and further discussion. I was able to find some anecdotal evidence that does keep open the possibility possibility that discussions among allies -- Canada, EU countries, UK, Japan -- may have influenced decisions made about US Treasuries by allies such as Japan's sales. Of course, those discussions among allies would not have included China which also is reported to have sold US Treasuries. Maybe the important observation here is that allies with large holdings of US Treasuries can individually, jointly, or even individually but concurrently exert significant impact on the US economy and financial position. Also, I subsequently found a Snopes.com article which cites the timeline mismatch that you mention but more broadly was neither able to confirm nor refute the hypothesis.

However, in my mind the important 'take away' is more about the fact that the US does not hold 'all the cards', and in fact, other countries acting together can put significant hurt on us. By mistreating allies, we raise this risk of them acting jointly against us.

This statement from a CNBC article is a more general statement about what is at risk and how allies and others are thinking: "'The market is re-assessing the structural attractiveness of the dollar as the world’s global reserve currency and is undergoing a process of rapid de-dollarization,' Deutsche Bank strategist George Saravelos said in a note to clients Friday."

Expand full comment
NSAlito's avatar

Sweet.

I love love love original sources like the treasury.gov site.

Thanks

Expand full comment
Carlisle Landel's avatar

Thanks for the Dean Blundell link. Excellent!!!

Expand full comment
Carol C's avatar

Blundell’s description of Carney’s moves made sense to me. Carney may have more effect if he is not widely given credit. Stealth plus economic expertise?

Expand full comment
NSAlito's avatar

Carney not wanting credit must be such an alien concept to Trump.

Expand full comment
Barbara's avatar

It's nice that you send links, but I doubt they bother to look at them, since any link could contain malicious code, from their point of view. I suggest mentioning an article and where it's published and why you think it's important. Infrequently, your actual note might get to a member. One of mine did.

Expand full comment
NSAlito's avatar

"...since any link could contain malicious code."

I was about to point out that a .gov site should be safe, then I remembered that Muskrats could have been crawling all over it.

Expand full comment
Barbara's avatar

I was referring to links that Majorie was sending and whether a stranger would click on them. But your point is well taken for other circumstances.

Expand full comment
Data Driven's avatar

Thank you, Barbara. This is a fair point. As with the earlier post, I usually try to provide both the link and the source. I'll just provide the source in the future.

Thank you again!

Expand full comment
Barbara's avatar

Thanks Marjorie. I appreciate your efforts. We should all do what you do.

Expand full comment
Frau Katze's avatar

Links to another Substack aren’t malicious.

There’s a spam link posted near the top. I tried to report it but “Submit Report” doesn’t work on my iPhone.

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

Can you get someone to help you go with a wheelchair? That may sound callous, but the last protest I went to there were people in wheelchairs and I thought it was a powerful statement.

You also don't need to go for hours. The protests I've been to were very safe and had a good vibe. Money just isn't going to cut it now. I think bodies in the street count. I also think this is a fight best done by old people who aren't going to be tempted into stupidity. Let's face it, attacking grandma is a very, very bad look...especially to maga men.

Expand full comment
Penelope Lane's avatar

I’d be happy to go in a wheelchair . In fact, I’m about to go to California to visit family and am renting a wheelchair there. The nearest protest is several miles away and it makes more sense for me to support the protest organizers.

Expand full comment
Penelope Lane's avatar

One of the reasons I need a wheelchair is that I went to the original Women’s March when Trump was first elected. I walked 15 miles that day and sadly did permanent damage to my right foot. Still, I wouldn’t have missed that experience for anything!

Expand full comment
Charles Bryan's avatar

Ms. Lane, you are my hero! I did some long protest marches against the Iraq War -- one in a pouring downpour in the streets of Los Angeles -- but nothing to compare to your ordeal.

Expand full comment
Penelope Lane's avatar

I have a son and daughter in law in Los Angeles and will be there later this month. Can’t wait!

Expand full comment
Kathleen Dennis's avatar

I'm 77 and am attending every local protest I can and I bring signs. I use cardboard and wide markers to write big words so they can be seen. Bring back Mr. Garcia! Bring back our migrants! Send Elon and Eric to CECOT! Hands off my right to vote! Arrest the Felon for murdering Palestinians! 5 signs. Do what you can. Bring your wheelchair, cane, walker! Better yet bring 3 friends with signs!

I garden and learn to watercolor paint in the rest of my day that isn't spent taking care of my husband who is recovering from rectal cancer and knee surgery to repair quads that were severed from his kneecap.

Expand full comment
Kathi Ruel's avatar

My best to you and your husband. You sound amazing.

Expand full comment
Anne's avatar

Yes, at our Hands Off rally one of our speakers was in a wheelchair and spoke eloquently about disability rights and the impact of cutting Medicaid. Also talked about being the canaries in the coal mine.

Expand full comment
longtimebirdwatcher's avatar

But, the demonstrators often don't set the tone of the demonstration. Take a look at civil rights demonstrations and demonstrations on campuses in the Sixties.

Expand full comment
shannon stoney's avatar

Also use 5 Calls. AOC says it makes a difference. I'm not sure all the protests make any difference at all.

Expand full comment
Kathi Ruel's avatar

I think the protests are helpful if for no other reason than to educate others.

Expand full comment
Terence Taaffe's avatar

Shannon. It’s fair your offer & provide your expertise and opinion on protests. But in consideration of improving the present situation —I believe it’s not beneficial to only provide statements or info based in your historical opinion that that protests won’t work. You need to also provide info and/or opinions on SOLUTIONS that may work.

Providing your knowledge on what will work combined with what you know hasn’t worked —will add credibility & positivity to your words

Expand full comment
shannon stoney's avatar

I don't claim to have any ideas. Do you? I'm still thinking. Just not wasting energy and time on futile events. Right now my approach is: stay home, grow food, hope to have enough to give away when the real crunch comes. Subscribe to my free gardening substack for more tips.

Expand full comment
Frau Katze's avatar

The protests certainly can’t hurt.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 13
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
shannon stoney's avatar

I have been to perhaps fifty of these protests in my lifetime. I organized a lot of them in my twenties. I am 70 now. In my own community, I photographed dozens of protests beginning in 2016 and donated my archive to the local university.

Street protests may make YOU feel better, but in the last 40 years in the US, they have changed almost nothing about public policy. I began to realize that protests are a party to make liberals feel better about themselves, to feel as if they're doing something, but since they're just for one day usually, they change nothing. The oligarchs ignore these events, because they can.

Even the protests that last for days, weeks and months accomplish little except to harden the power brokers' resolve and make them more hateful and vindictive. See my example below:

What changed my feeling about public protests was spending eleven years in the gun violence prevention movement in TN, beginning in 2012. In 2023 there was a horrible school shooting. There were lots of protests and direct action and lobbying legislatures on our part. Some of these events included kids who were survivors of school shootings. The TN legislature ended up doubling down on loosening gun laws, as if to make their point that nothing we did mattered at all. They like "owning the libs," which in this case was grieving mothers and children.

It doesn't matter how YOU feel during and after a protest. Or it matters only a little. What matters is: does anything change? It does not. Not any more.

I know this is hard to hear. But I really feel as if constant lobbying is the only thing that might be even minimally effective, and even that is not very effective, at least not in TN. The only thing that will change the current swing to the Right in America is for Republican voters to change. This may happen if the Trump people bungle things catastrophically. But it may only change things for one election cycle. Republicans seem unable to remember that their leaders have wrecked the economy over and over.

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

You may be right, but I think it's our obligation to the younger generation to try to do something.

It may take decades or generations, but its better to do something than nothing.

Expand full comment
shannon stoney's avatar

It does make you feel better and it's kind of fun. That's the main value. In my family, the younger generation does NOT take its cues from the old people! They think we're clueless.

Expand full comment
Bill Heck's avatar

Admittedly, protests against gun violence don't seem to have had much effect. However, being 70, you may remember the protests against the Vietnam war. Those certainly contributed to change. So do protests work? Apparently sometimes.

Expand full comment
shannon stoney's avatar

Agree. That's why I organized several protests in TN during the late 1970s. This was when TVA had the biggest nuclear plant build-out program in the US. They planned not only regular nuclear reactors but also breeder reactors which created plutonium for bombs.

This activism had little to no effect. TVA didn't build all of the nuclear plants that it planned because they turned out to be very expensive, and the electricity was nowhere near "too cheap to meter." They did build the Sequoyah Nuclear plant near Chattanooga where I lived at the time.

I think that since the Vietnam War protests and the civil rights movement, protests have NOT worked. Also, the govt figured out that the real cause of anti-war protests was the draft, and they switched to the all-volunteer army. Protest against foreign wars, even very stupid ones, evaporated. The few demonstrations that occurred in the early aughties were inconsequential. (I participated on one such protest in Houston.)

The biggest street protests since that era have been the BLM protests. You could argue that these protests resulted in some police depts using body cameras, but that is about the extent of it. Cops still shoot unarmed people at about the same rate as they did before 2020.

I think that our political system has changed so that street protests no longer make a difference. I can't explain exactly why. It may be that the combined novelty of TV and protests in the 1960s was key. TV and protests are no longer novel. IN some cases protests actually cause backlash and more authoritarianism. I think it could be argued that the BLM protests may have in the long run empowered the authoritarian Right. They certainly contributed to gun sales.

What about the pro-Palestinian "encampments"? Have they changed anything at all? Gaza is still a mess. The Trump people can now claim that universities are somehow "anti-semitic" for allowing these protests to continue.

There was also the ill-fated Occupy "movement." Nada.

The fact that street protests no longer "work" may be the result of work on the part of what we used to call The Establishment. They were alarmed and caught off guard by the actions of the 1950s, 1960s, and early 1970s. But since then, they have been able to safely ignore these events. They may send out police on occasion, as during the BLM protests, which lasted longer than, say, the Women's March.

ONe day events are just parties for liberals. More sustained efforts like the BLM protests are more serious challenges to the status quo, but as we saw, they were rather brutally suppressed with arrests and some beatings. Most liberals don't have the stomach to stay in the streets for days, as Ukrainians did during the Maidan events, or as Chinese people did at Tiananmen Square. Perhaps this is the problem. A one-day march, while fun, is no threat to anybody.

Expand full comment
longtimebirdwatcher's avatar

Yes, but those were major demonstrations with 100K-500K people. When I see the numbers from the April 5 demonstrations, they don't even qualify as demonstrations compared to what I did sixty years ago (15,000 in one demonstration was the first one in 1965). And how many went to MLK's demonstration on the Mall? 500 people is not much by my standards.

Expand full comment
Brent Stahl's avatar

My sentiments also. All of the street protests in Israel (anti-Bibi) and in Hungary (anti-Orban) over the years have accomplished exactly nothing.

Expand full comment
shannon stoney's avatar

Did you go to the recent protests in the US? It seems that you live in Mexico now, in San Miguel. I've heard that's a nice place with a lot of artsy rich Americans. I am still here in rural TN, in a red county in a red state. Not leaving. Not going abroad. Not going anywhere.

Expand full comment
Lorraine Parish's avatar
User was temporarily suspended for this comment. Show
Expand full comment
jb from Weston's avatar

Hey, Girls, please play nice.

We're all on the same team.

Shannon, I've lived in TN, understand (I think) your frustration, and applaud whatever efforts you feel you can make in whatever way you can make them. Surviving at all is success.

Lorraine, I'm sorry you are ill. I understand your feelings were hurt by an assumption that you were a wealthy elitist of sorts, when the truth may be very different and you have also worked very hard to help others (thank you).

We all fear the fall of our democracy, which I fear is ever more likely the more fractured -- and fractious -- we become.

In the words of the prophet, "Can't we all just get along?".

Expand full comment
shannon stoney's avatar

Wow. I'm impressed, Lorraine. You're good at cussin'. We value that in rural TN.

Expand full comment
shannon stoney's avatar

If you doubt what I wrote above, listen to Ezra Klein's podcast about DOGE recently. Apparently DOGE was waiting for people to get mad about them zeroing out USAID. People DID get mad. Did DOGE reinstate USAID? No.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Dintaman's avatar

Me too.

Expand full comment
longtimebirdwatcher's avatar

I'm only 75, but I remember the riots in Berkeley when I was a teenager. I don't want to find myself in the same situation now and endangering other people by being less mobile. I've spent my entire life supporting causes when I could, and now other people will have to step up.

Expand full comment
GhostOnTheHalfShell's avatar

You should try to have a chat with the organizers the indivisible folks. You might find them extremely interested finding ways to make the rallies accessible to yourself so that you can add yourself to the numbers.

If you are healthy enough to go, they might find a way to include you in the rallies and anyone else who’s elderly, but otherwise fit to spend a couple hours in the sunshine or shade

Expand full comment
Diane McConnell's avatar

I also stepped up my political donations.

Expand full comment
Penny Boone's avatar

Me too.

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

This makes the teapot dome scandal look like a tea party.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 13Edited
Expand full comment
Frau Katze's avatar

Get lost spammer!

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

It's a great reminder of the imperative that we Rise! Resist! ✊✊✊

April 19 is the next nationwide rally, be there or be square!

//

Don't let up folks, it's working:

Boycott TE卐LA! Boycott Swastikar!

Short TE卐LA! Short Swastikar!

Boycott 卐tarlink!

Boycott 卐/Twitter!

Curb your DOGE!

https://generalstrikeus.com/strikecard

https://www.fiftyfifty.one/

https://indivisible.org/

https://handsoff2025.com/

https://www.teslatakedown.com/

https://www.riseandresist.org/

https://thirdact.org

Expand full comment
Conor Gallogly's avatar

Add boycott Amazon and boycott Meta!

Expand full comment
Cindy La Ferle's avatar

Many people I know are boycotting Amazon and have been doing so for the past 3 months. In the process, we are all seeking out the makers of the products we want to purchase and are ordering directly from them. This takes more work, but it's worth it. It's also a good discipline for those of us who are trying to save money in the midst of this economic uncertainty. A wise thing to do.

Expand full comment
Joanna Weinberger's avatar

It’s most important to boycott gasoline and other fossil fuels.

Many people have boycotted Nestle since the CEO said humans don’t deserve clean water. After Nestle took a large position in L’Oreal (soon after Lillian Betancourt died) that corporation was added to the boycott.

Expand full comment
Bruce's avatar

"It’s most important to boycott gasoline and other fossil fuels."

Difficult for those of us a) not wealthy enough to buy a new EV, b) not lucky enough to be near a charging network (if we rent) , and c) somewhere public transport is a shambles. My own, nominally 'liberal' city is cutting bus lines like the one by my house; when they do I'll have to walk a half mile to the nearest east-west line. Potentially in 115° summer heat. We recently broke the all-time record for 'earliest day for a 100° high temp'. We've been keeping records here since the 1880's...

B WAS being helped by the Inflation Reduction Act, but of course that's been cancelled by Malicious Mussolini because we have to reverse anything Biden signed.

Expand full comment
Ed Weber's avatar

It's a "matter of degree" and no one should feel compelled to make an immediate investment needed to curb use of fossil fuels. But the next vehicle purchased by anyone with a conscience and a brain should use as little fossil fuel as possible - not stupidly big and heavy...hopefully at least a hybrid, if not a PHEV or EV. A very big difference could be made if masses of people were willing to make incremental changes.

Expand full comment
Bruce's avatar

The ironic thing is, until the Orange Moron blew up the US economy..we were looking at getting one. As it is, we're making strategic purchases of some things now, and putting off larger ones for now. I'm not alone in this either.

And that is precisely what fuels a recession.

Expand full comment
Joanna Weinberger's avatar

I hear you. I’m in Jacksonville FL where TPTB associate public transit with federally court-ordered bussing to achieve school desegregation in the 1970s. The public transit is intentionally messed up and few white people will go near it. Uber and similar are somewhat more successful. Pedestrians and bicyclists risk fatal injury from motorists.

Expand full comment
Bruce's avatar

I remember visiting our in-laws in Ft Meyers and was struck how insanely hostile the environment is to anyone not in a car.

Expand full comment
Maureen Morgan's avatar

I didn’t know Nestle had taken over L’Oreal. That’s off my shopping list too, now. It may not be much but our purchasing power is the most direct we have. I haven’t used Amazon for years. Didn’t like the way they treat their workers. Also, some years ago they persuaded Swansea Council in Wales to build a road to a new distribution centre they were developing, saying it would provide 1000’s of jobs. As soon as it opened, Amazon explored large scale automation. Neither my husband nor I have bought anything from it since. Can be a bit inconvenient, but worth it. Never been on Facebook - too boring

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Definitely!

Expand full comment
Kathi Ruel's avatar

Although for many folks Amazon is a necessary evil.

Expand full comment
Brent James's avatar

Interesting timing this next protest date of April 19 when one considers April 20 is the date Trump can invoke whatever powers under the Insurrection Act. Coincidence?

Expand full comment
Doug G's avatar

April 18th-19th is the 250th anniversary of the Battle of Lexington and Concord, the "shot heard 'round the world". Although there were actions taken preceding these dates, it's generally considered to be the start of the American Revolution, leading to the Declaration of Independence in 1776. NO KINGS!!!

Expand full comment
77 Square Miles's avatar

"I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical."

— Thomas Jefferson

Expand full comment
John Gregory's avatar

Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act any time - since nobody seems to hold him to the actual presence of an emergency requiring it. On April 20, he gets a report from 'advisors' about the need for it, so he will have a little cover.

It's pretty clear from all the news, including the actual marching of 5 million people with not even a traffic ticket to show for it, than the opposition to him is not (yet) an insurrection. That won't change from April 19 to April 20...

Expand full comment
LeslieN's avatar

He won't need a reason. He'll just do it. Who is there to step up and actually stop him?

Expand full comment
Charles Bryan's avatar

The U.S. military (who would enforce the Insurrection Act's martial law imposition) has sworn an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, not to obey illegal orders from Mango Mussolini.

Expand full comment
Ethereal fairy Natalie's avatar

Yes, but they are poisoning them with Fox propaganda channel blaring on every base 24/7

Expand full comment
LeslieN's avatar

One can hope, but we've yet to see even a hint of courage to obey that oath.

Expand full comment
Bruce's avatar

Since they're openly disappearing people because allegedly their words are danger to US National Security, actually meeting the legal definition of "insurrection" is not likely to deter him.

Expand full comment
Marge Wherley's avatar

According to MSNBC, they are now deporting for thoughts and actions that haven’t even occurred but could happen in the future. Nothing says “Orwell was right” more than this!

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

I don't think it is a coincidence at all. It's a real emergency.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

20 April 1889 Adolf Hitler's birthday.

Expand full comment
Meg Inwood's avatar

If it *is* coincidence, I just lost a lot of respect for the organizations that planned these nationwide protests and set the dates. I really, really don't think those organizations are run by people who are that stupid and unaware of what's happening in Trump's administration, though. If they were that dumb and unobservant, they wouldn't be organizing repeated nationwide protests in the first place!

Expand full comment
Sarah A. Green's avatar

And show up at your LOCAL meetings of elected officials, cities, townships, counties. Ask what they are doing to protect their residents. https://open.substack.com/pub/sarahagreen1/p/local-action-for-democracy

Expand full comment
Greg Pendrey's avatar

Agreed 👍

Expand full comment
Hew Hamilton's avatar

Trade is the one thing that Musk has fought against. He wants zero tariffs.

Expand full comment
Joy Reynolds's avatar

but he wants zero regulations and ALL the govt contracts

Expand full comment
Ethereal fairy Natalie's avatar

And an endless supply of educated indentured labor, via work visa.

Expand full comment
Carol Ann's avatar

Saturday, April 19th. Bless you for that determination - remember, you can car-protest too (drive by with signs in the passenger-side windows, giving honks & thumbs-up to the protesters). Here's a link to more info: https://www.newsweek.com/nationwide-trump-protest-april19-50501-handsoff-2056119

Expand full comment
Kate Feldman's avatar

Also we need to use American Flags! More more more. We need to take over the image that WE are the patriots. More flags people. More flags. Have never had one in my life but I'm getting one!

Expand full comment
WDD's avatar

At the Pensacola HANDS OFF event we had a couple of large service flags which added emphasis to the numerous handmade signs opposing cuts to the VA. This area has a large military presence and as some active duty personnel (BDUs, helmets, reflective vests) rode motorcycles to or from their stations I watched them turn their heads towards the flags -- they caught eyeballs. These warriors had the self discipline to not wave or give other signs of support while in uniform, but they recognized their family. More of this, please!

Expand full comment
Kathy Darby's avatar

Exactly! I wore a sparkly red, white and blue cowboy hat at the last Hands off protest and until folks saw my sign, they thought I was Maga. Yes, flags and show our patriotism

Expand full comment
Bonnie Fuller's avatar

Totally agree! I will buy a flag to take to next protest.

Expand full comment
LeslieN's avatar

Have always flown mine, with many replacements when weather worn.

Expand full comment
Cissna, Ken's avatar

Nearly 80. And me too.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

We can lean on one another Pete.

Expand full comment
Thomascfox's avatar

I am in a very similar situation at age 81.

Expand full comment
Phyllis Nauts's avatar

Me too. And I'm 91.

Expand full comment
Penelope Lane's avatar

I’m 87 and I agree, but my physical condition precludes actual attendance. I’ll just help support those who can physically attend!

Expand full comment
Barbara's avatar

I'm so glad you can do that. I am 78 and uncomfortable with crowds due to autoimmune disorders, so I am donating money and also writing here and elsewhere as much as possible. I write and edit voter information for my local Democratic Party as well as other pieces, including a recent commentary for an online newspaper. There is plenty for all of us to do with our time and talent.

Expand full comment
shayaz's avatar

Me too, I’m 78 and as we both know nonviolent protesting is important… we are all in this together …. Unfortunately again…. Protest🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Expand full comment
Buckhurst4's avatar

Awesome! You are keeping up to date with Substack, very impressive! 👍

Expand full comment
Virginia Russell's avatar

April 19

Expand full comment
Markets Zoon's avatar

Electoral outcomes, when observed over time, display statistical regularities, yet these patterns are not temporally stable. While certain jurisdictions may appear structurally robust, the persistence of political equilibria is contingent on a range of economic and institutional factors. In this sense, stability is often illusory, a function of historical path dependence rather than an inherent characteristic of the system itself. It is particularly relevant to consider how shifts in political preferences can be conceptualized probabilistically, with different regimes corresponding to distinct probability distributions. Movements toward the tails of these distributions should be avoided, as they are typically dangerous and, more often than not, unidirectional.

https://open.substack.com/pub/marketszoon/p/quants-of-politics?r=58uzcq&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

Expand full comment
Markets Zoon's avatar

Electoral outcomes, when observed over time, display statistical regularities, yet these patterns are not temporally stable. While certain jurisdictions may appear structurally robust, the persistence of political equilibria is contingent on a range of economic and institutional factors. In this sense, stability is often illusory, a function of historical path dependence rather than an inherent characteristic of the system itself. It is particularly relevant to consider how shifts in political preferences can be conceptualized probabilistically, with different regimes corresponding to distinct probability distributions. The shift toward the tails of the distribution should be avoided; they are dangeorous.

https://open.substack.com/pub/marketszoon/p/quants-of-politics?r=58uzcq&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

Expand full comment
Michel Goethals's avatar

I fully agree but am afraid that protests will not be enough to stop these guys.

Greetings from Europe.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

This nation will not survive this level of corruption and incompetence for 4 years. The damage they've done in just three months is astonishing. Something has to be done.

Expand full comment
czb's avatar

I don’t mean to be disagreeable or undiplomatic, but how is your comment not garden variety hand wringing? “Something must be done!”? Well, are you willing to channel your inner Bonhoeffer? I didn’t think so. Is Susan Collins going to grow a pair and mobilize 20 GOP votes to convict? I don’t think so. Do what exactly? The opportunity to do something was the last four years. We failed to convict. We failed to prosecute the case successfully to the American public. I’m not sure anything can be done short of rushing the cockpit or waiting for this clown to hang himself by going too far.

Expand full comment
Stephen Brady's avatar

This was a coup, many years in the making. The forces of greed and fanaticism came together to put their useful idiot-king in the seat of power. SCOTUS and the rethugs in Congress seem content to let him crash the Nation.

Expand full comment
Miles vel Day's avatar

It's interesting. Like, in my view, the right-wing destruction of democracy has been a clear goal of the Republican party since Watergate. But because of the rise of Trump, that coup did not end up looking anything like what they expected it to. And what they got is really stupid and unsustainable; if they knew this was the best version of their coup they could have gotten, maybe they would have decided they were better off being a bunch of Gerald Fords.

Expand full comment
Stephen Brady's avatar

Rethuglicans no longer think, they just react - to whatever Faux Snooze tells them to be angry at on any given day.

Expand full comment
Ethereal fairy Natalie's avatar

Yes they are "anger addicts" dependent on their next "fix" of Angertainment.

Expand full comment
Chris hellberg's avatar

The less popular he becomes, the harder it is for more of his agenda to get done.

Expand full comment
Joy Reynolds's avatar

Not really. They don't need to please the voters. They just have to delay the court cases. They are already driving out all the federal workers who don't agree.

Expand full comment
Chris hellberg's avatar

Voter sentiment does matter. Think of the carve outs republicans in congress are getting for their districts. The House thinks to the next two years. If they won’t get re-elected, they’re gonna look for ways to push back against the agenda to placate their voters

Expand full comment
Bruce's avatar

They're terrified of getting primaried by even more MAGA opponents. So long as the X/YouTube/Facebook/TikTock/Fox News propaganda machine keeps pumping out the dopamine hits for ever-increasing hatred, MAGAt's will vote against their own interests just to hurt those 'other' people.

The fashion right now is wearing Dear Leader pins https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/trumps-new-loyalty-test-golden-trump-bust-lapel-pins/ar-AA1CDffm to show your loyalty. No more American Flag pins....

Expand full comment
Mark Garrity's avatar

The more his popularity sinks the less terrified they will be. By 2027 if we don't have enough Democrats in the senate to convict there will be some Republicans willing to go Goldwater on this Nixon to preserve their own political hides.

Expand full comment
Rex Page (Left Coast)'s avatar

The problem is that the felon is doing exactly what his supporters elected him to do. Deporting people they don’t like, especially students pursuing graduate degrees? Check. Disappearing people with tattoos and dark skin in hell holes? Check. Defunding Ivy League schools? Check. They haven’t ordered the National Guard to murder any peaceful protesters yet, but if they do, their supporters will cheer, just like most white Americans did after the Kent State murders. The felon is not the crux of the problem. The problem is 77 million US voters. Always has been. Some of the murderous throng that cheered Kent State have died, but they’ve been replaced by people just as bad who now have the advantage of a well-organized, well-financed crew of nefarious operatives running the Republican Party and using the votes of the murderous throng to hand them the reins of power unimpeded by legal constraints.

Expand full comment
Joy Reynolds's avatar

I think that tRump taking the oath of office and immediately pardoning the J6ers is him "giving aid and comfort to insurrectionists", and disqualifies him from being president.

Expand full comment
Kathi Ruel's avatar

🤞🙏🤞🙏🤞🙏🤞

Expand full comment
Carmen RG's avatar

If Andy is hand wringing, you’ve given up! How is that any better? At least with hand wringing, which I don’t agree with in this situation, there’s room for hope.

Expand full comment
Nancy Evans's avatar

I’m fantasizing about an Air Force one plane crash 😉

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

I enjoy wringing my hands in the garden. It helps loosen the sinews. As to neck stretching that seems a less than effective means of protest. Just sit by and watch. Organic things happen, well, organically.

Expand full comment
Erich Bruhn's avatar

Disagree. Stretching people’s necks is a time honored method of dealing with dictators.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Dietrich got his in '45. Better he should have lived to see the end he advocated for.

Expand full comment
czb's avatar

That's a fair point. Consider that Bonhoeffer is a placeholder as a logic model. Some 4,440 allied troops died on DDAY. About 19,000 in the Battle of the Bulge. About 7,000 at Anzio. It's a long list. Each in their own way was either rushing the cockpit or told to, in their own way each was Bonhoeffer in his own right. And, in turn, DB was each of them in his own way. The question for us to day, and I absolutely include myself, is what form will our (my) fighting back take? We will whine on the NYTs, or will we quit our jobs? Will we march until we are arrested or watch TV coverages of others' protesting? Will will watch our 401s be whittled away to 50 cents on the dollar valuations, and then become motivated, or be content to be quiet with just 20% losses while the building blocks of a civil society are shredded? I don't have any answers.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

My experience is that when confronted with an abstract vs. practical response most will find a practical way to respond. The emphasis in that observation is on confronted. How and with what immediacy is the confrontation? Is it an emotional spur of the moment act or a calculated assessment of outcomes? Dietrich found himself captive with no possibility of escaping who he was or what he thought. Was Kerry's last man to die in Viet Nam aware of the fact and able to choose? I had a relative wounded in the Bulge. He went on to a second wound before it was over. He never expressed regret that I heard. Since you have brought up your individuality let me say that when confronted I have avoided the emotional spur of the moment decision. I have quit a job and relinquished a student deferment. What I have avoided is rioting and uncivil behavior. Whatever anyone chooses to do will be influenced by who they associate with. As you move forward recognize that simple reality and you will be deciding what you will do simultaneously with who you do it with. Dietrich would be satisfied with the idea that "Each was a Bonhoeffer in his own right". Sitting here I can't imagine a nicer thing ever said about anyone.

Expand full comment
Miles vel Day's avatar

"Well, are you willing to channel your inner Bonhoeffer? I didn’t think so."

The unfortunate truth is that if nobody is willing to die then we're just going to have to stick around and see what happens. Elections are an alternative to violence. If you want to cancel one, it takes violence.

So maybe the "what should be done!" crowd can just focus on the thing 19 months from now that we know can be done... either that or start doing stuff you can't talk about on the internet. Which I don't advise.

(The fact that nobody has little enough to lose to martyr themselves is actually a sign of how well-managed this country has been over the last 25 years, despite the bottomless and insatiable dissatisfaction of an ennui-saturated public.)

Expand full comment
Chris Danes's avatar

“Garden variety hand wringing”… I’m not sure that is helpful either. But I agree, many of us are feeling desperate- if not for our immediate selves- certainly for our sense of what our nation should be. I feel that we all have to exert our own power, as small as it may seem. We have to say “No”. “No more”. A General Strike is the one idea that seems to have the needed power.

Expand full comment
Conor Gallogly's avatar

This nation survived decades of slavery, a century keeping women from voting, a civil war, economic depressions in which a quarter of the country was out of work, political assassinations and riots.

We won’t look the same and the suffering will be real. And as long as people are willing to keep speaking up and organizing we will turn the tide. Might just take a while

Expand full comment
Bob Tinsman's avatar

If you look at the history of other mass movements like civil rights or labor rights, they developed over decades of organizing and building. Collective action can be powerful, but it requires persistence.

Expand full comment
Marliss Desens's avatar

Agreed. The 19th Amendment, expanding to women the right to vote, took many years. Susan B. Anthony and many other leaders of the movement did not live to see its passage and be able to vote.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

The United States of America wasn't built in a day?

Expand full comment
Marliss Desens's avatar

And the United States of America will always be under construction. It is our duty to make sure that the construction is for the better.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Foundations of self-serving won't stand the test of time.

Expand full comment
Chris Danes's avatar

Is still being built

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

It was particularly gratifying to see Bernie reminding the Coachella audience of that.

Expand full comment
August Bakenhus's avatar

Yea but you listed the progress that has been made, now we are going backwards, fast and far more deeply than what anyone could have imagined.

Expand full comment
Conor Gallogly's avatar

Going backwards is a self-inflicted wound for sure. Just not the end of America

Expand full comment
JRS 65's avatar

What I cannot fathom is why Trump just gets away with everything he does with zero consequences. If Biden or any Dem President did anything as stupid as this he or she would be gone. But with Trump he is given a pass (especially from the press) time and time again. It’s infuriating.

Expand full comment
DJ Chicago Cook's avatar

It's the right wing press - they are singing the praises of the brilliant Trump. They stuck with him through the whole tariff thing, despite a few Republicans peeling off. They will never cover protests, or will say it's a handful of paid or antifa left wing, darkly hinting about twrrorism or betrayal. They convinced millions of voters, if not directly by word of mouth, that an excellent economy was bad, that a border brought under control was an invasion, that solud management if the country was destroying it. It's the elephant in the room. And we have no counter, as the mainstream press panders and sane-washes.

Expand full comment
David Betts's avatar

Look no further than the R wingnuts in congress. They are getting essentially what they want without casting a vote nor taking much blame.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Remember Reagan the Teflon president?

Expand full comment
Frau Katze's avatar

The MAGA movement is still strong. The new line is that the good effects of the tariffs will take time. They also firmly believe that all these countries have high tariffs and are “ripping America off.”

I see their comments at the WSJ all the time.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 13
Comment removed
Expand full comment
JRS 65's avatar

He has tanked the economy on his own. His cabinet members go on an app to discuss classified info. He golfs rather than governs and those trips cost tax payers a fortune (and the $$$ goes to his golf resorts). and probably did insider trading. He lets the richest man in the world destroy the infrastructure- Yet, the press is quiet. I’ll say it again, Biden or any other Dem president could not get a pass on all of that like Trump does.

Expand full comment
John Gregory's avatar

Biden did not (and so far as I know does not) have dementia. He was slow on the update at the gotcha pace of the debate, especially since he had a torrent of lies coming at him and he was trying to speak the truth.

His resting demeanor is definitely disengaged, but that does not mean his mind is.

A month after the debate, he gave an unrehearsed hour-long discussion of foreign policy after the NATO meeting, in the presence of the press, and was very coherent and knowledgeable. He muffed a couple of names but his strategic analysis was not wrong. No dementia there.

Trump could not talk foreign policy for 2 minutes, except about the imaginary horrors of immigration. He doesn't know the difference between 'asylum' as safety from persecution and 'asylum' as a place to keep people who are mentally ill. Recall his shark-and-electric-boat ramble.... that was an answer to a question about what he would do specifically about child poverty. THAT is dementia!

Expand full comment
Ethereal fairy Natalie's avatar

👆🎯

Expand full comment
Bruce's avatar

That nonsesense explanation is about as meaningful as vaccine conspiracy, which you traffic in. Do better.

Expand full comment
Ely's avatar
User was temporarily suspended for this comment. Show
Expand full comment
Bruce's avatar

Your junk science isn’t real science. And look, an Aussie nut job who can’t read the room calls me a Trump supporter, lol. I love a doctor of chiropractic pitching “science” to me, of all things. Get lost.

Expand full comment
andré's avatar

There were millions who took the covid-19 vaccines, and the hundreds of thousands who died were those who were not vaccinated.

BTW, myocarditis is a possible symptom of covid-19, not of any vaccination. (Look in up via Google.)

Expand full comment
Bruce's avatar

" Much of the law fare against Trump was uncalled for. "

If you or I absconded with boxes and boxes of classified documents upon leaving office, then lied to the FBI and the National Archives about possessing them, you or I would be in prison serving a long long sentence.

It you or I instigated an armed assault on Congress with the aim of overturning the results of a presidential election, you or I would be in prison serving a life sentence. WE ALL SAW THAT WITH OUR OWN EYES.

We have the recording of the phone call where he begged the Georgia Governor to "just find me enough votes to win" and he directed people to subvert the Electoral process by getting cronies in state Republican parties to seat "alternate electors" which is fraud, plain and simple.

Biden's alleged 'dementia' has nothing to do with any of that.

Expand full comment
Phil's avatar

No point in trying to refute the trolls spouting easily debunked talking points.

Being in a cult requires the members to believe certain myths that, even though they are easily debunked, they will never stop believing. Because once they admit reality once they know they will have to start accepting they have been massively conned, and their ego can't handle that.

So they stand behind their criminal orange Dear Leader come Hell or high water because the alternative is worse: Admitting liberals were right.

Expand full comment
Nancy The K's avatar

The tariffs are not irrational. They are a big money maker for Trump.

Expand full comment
andré's avatar

Funny, after Trumps bizarre performances since 2016 or before, some talk about Biden's dementia.

How is it Biden was able to express himself publicly clearly, and much more logically than Trump, except when he had covid during the debate ?

As for occasional memory loss, Trump is so scatter-brained that his memory loss is overlooked.

Expand full comment
Tom Hart's avatar

Irrational? Maliciously, treasonously insane!

Expand full comment
Krispy's avatar

Can’t survive a year.

Expand full comment
Bill Spornitz's avatar

The USA? there will be a shell of something. It's a big country, full of morons.

Expand full comment
andré's avatar

According to the last election, somewhat less than half full.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Timing is everything.

Expand full comment
Kate Feldman's avatar

Call your senators, especially the Rs. Call them EVERY DAY and demand they remember the declaration of Independence when we refused to pay taxes without representation. The constitutional over reach is the biggest betrayal. I'm calling John Thune every day and I'm a dem from Massachusetts.

Expand full comment
Mark Garrity's avatar

Saw an article about Democrats starting to talk about impeachment. I will be surprised if Trump lasts beyond 2027 at the latest.

Expand full comment
Dave Hopkins's avatar

It starts with never, ever voting for a Republican again. They are the brand and the chief enablers of this shitshow.

Expand full comment
shayaz's avatar

Protest when you can, let your voice be heard🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Expand full comment
TheWinePrince's avatar

Have you tried screaming at your congress peoples? Fear of reelection defeat is their only motivation.

Expand full comment
Kat Hudy's avatar

Totally agree! There has to be some way we can rid our country of him and his horrid minions, and have another election!

Expand full comment
Steve Schroeter's avatar

You have it right Andy.

Expand full comment
Linda OHara's avatar

You are so right. I really don’t know how to survive this shattering of EVERYTHING….

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Trump is making something great again, but it ain’t America.”

Thank you Professor, and sadly I am up this late; I mean this morning. Unfortunately, too many people just don’t understand fundamental economics, and it’s going to be the death of this country.

I still talk to MAGA cultists, and they think Trump is doing great things for America. You just can’t reach these people. Our status as the reserve currency of the world is on the menu, and they don’t understand the consequences. Nor do they understand that foreign investors, and the smart money are fleeing the US at alarming rates; for safer shores, while gold is trading at a record high, along with the increase and volatility in the treasury yields could mean doom: Stagflation.

When will this madness end, and America starts waking up. I read JP Morgan analyst was afraid to speak truthfully on an economic call this week with clients. What does that say about the state of our democracy today? Just asking for a friend!….:)

Expand full comment
justin SG's avatar

You can virtually ALWAYS predict what decisions Trump will make by asking yourself WWPD - What Would Putin Do?

Trump IS a Russian asset, whether he knows it or not.

If Trump KNOWS he is a Russian asset, that's EVIL.

If Trump DOESN'T KNOW he is a Russian asset, that's WORSE!

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

I often say that it doesn’t matter if Trump is a useful idiot, asset, or flat out compromised. Bottom line, Russia couldn’t have conceived a better chaos agent, causing nothing but destruction to our democracy, national security, economic health.

Trump is the gift that keeps on giving; to the peril of this nation…:)

Expand full comment
TOM PAIN's avatar

See my comment on this above.

Expand full comment
justin SG's avatar

I don't see it either.

Expand full comment
TOM PAIN's avatar

Looks like I got deleted, I don't see it either.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Please cut and paste. I can’t find it…:)

Expand full comment
TOM PAIN's avatar

I don't see it either looks like I got censored.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

It happens…:)

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Which one? Scissors or glue?:-)

Expand full comment
TOM PAIN's avatar

See my new comment below.

Expand full comment
TOM PAIN's avatar

See TRUMP IS A KGB AGENT SASHA SOTNIK, video, YT, Sotnik is Russian,

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

That's very true, but there's also personal profit involved. Look at all the insider trading that's been happening. Just follow the money.

Expand full comment
justin SG's avatar

Yes Winston! And that mob-boss profiteering is very much a Putin tactic.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

It's something they share.

Expand full comment
stupidfood's avatar

He is also a Chinese asset, although he could not know.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Well said…:)

Expand full comment
Roger M. Moery's avatar

Sociopaths are so easily manipulated. I used to say about my father that he would tell anything if someone bragged on him.

Expand full comment
TOM PAIN's avatar

See my comment on this above.

Expand full comment
drllau's avatar

> can't reach these people

I believe *deflection* comes after denial. Next the administration will find someone to blame, not the Jewish moneylender due to Isreali Lobby but prob Japanese hedge fund, EU shadowy banks, or nefarious narco-states dumping dollar to justify intervention later (once you've got control of ACH you can just impound bond redemptions). If the dollar weakens significantly then GFC will appear to b entre compared with institutions fleeing to other havens.

Hopefully sanity prevails.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

As Mark Twain once said, “it’s easier to fool a man, than to convince him he’s ever been fooled…:)

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

I'm really curious who's snapping up all those gold futures, besides the foreign investors I mean. Just follow the money.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Exactly, the smart money is in gold, silver and platinum. I’m also converting my dollars to Swiss Francs, yen and Euro’s.

By the way, Trump has a huge pile of gold. coincidence?..:)

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

That might explain his sudden out of the blue interest in Fort Knox.

Expand full comment
Joy Reynolds's avatar

"You just can't reach these people."

It's difficult, but doable. Show them this short video: "Fox News lied to me"

https://www.reddit.com/r/FOXNEWS/s/2OVaqpOUqD

Expand full comment
David O Neuschulz's avatar

I *am* up in the middle of the night. The U.S. is in the grip of a kind of mass hysteria, presenting in its paralytic form. One mad king on his mad throne is not the problem, its the sheer number of abetting sycophants that he has surrounded himself with and in congress.

You know, the legendary mass suicide of lemmings has been revealed to have been a hoax, but I think we have an actual example here in human affairs.

Expand full comment
JaySo's avatar

And there’s all those fucks who voted for him. I would be so relieved if the general elections were rigged last time and 70 some million US voters didn’t vote for the current occupant.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

That might just yet prove to be the case.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Wow, I didn't know about this. In case anyone is interested, here's the explanation:

https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=wildlifenews.view_article&articles_id=56

And yeah, MAGAnuts are the real Lemmings.

Expand full comment
Steven Meyerson's avatar

Problem is, anti-corruption law enforcement has been politicized, weaponized, and corrupted by Trump. So who’s watching the chicken coop? Oh, it’s the fox!

Expand full comment
Stephen Bosch's avatar

The fox even has his own news channel.

Expand full comment
Syrianna's avatar

Orwell cringes at the title. The irony is too thick to slice.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

It's like he's daring us to call him out on it.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

That's the fun of it:-)

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Chainsaw

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Incredible. Just incredible.

Expand full comment
Damon Ciarelli's avatar

Im in Singapore right now. It’s a country that made it from 3rd to 1st world status in a little less than 100 years through competent and considerate leadership. It’s not an easy trick to pull off. Trump is making the opposite trick look really easy though!

Expand full comment
Ron's avatar

Thanks to thermodynamics, disorder and chaos are the default form of reality.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

I second that law.

Expand full comment
Michael Sanders's avatar

All the chaos around tariffs has taken Signalgate out of the headlines. He wants chaos. My greatest fear is at some point soon, when his approval rating drops even more, he will say there is no way to guarantee free and fair elections and will cancel the 2026 mid-terms. Good bye Constitution.

Expand full comment
Lee Peters's avatar

SCOTUS and the MAGA Congress have already killed the Constitution. SCOTUS created a king last year with its immunity ruling and has knocked off Habeas corpus this year, while MAGA Congresspeople refuse to perform their duty as the check and balance. Even if there were free and fair elections in 2026, they would refuse any results that didn’t confirm MAGAs. See North Carolina’s state Supreme Court for their playbook.

Expand full comment
Michael Sanders's avatar

Yup. NC is a great example of where “they” are going with this whole election thing.

Expand full comment
Joy Reynolds's avatar

We have to take out the Repubs that aren't doing their jobs.

Make a complaint on their surety bonds: https://bondsforthewin.com/

Expand full comment
Michael Sanders's avatar

Interesting thought. I see where a notary public might have liability if they don’t properly vet people they’re certifying. Do Congressional Reps have surety bonds? You have any source that tells us? I worked for many years in “the deep state” and never was bonded even though I had amounts with many zeros and commas under my control.

Expand full comment
Joy Reynolds's avatar

My search foo is failing me, but this surety company site says it's from 1792. https://suretybondauthority.com/public-official-bonds/

Other pages I have read say that the bond for the official taking the oath covers their subordinates, and that they don't really want people to know that they can make claims on the bonds, but they have to tell you the bond company if you ask.

I say it's worth a try. This company site says you can claim misfeasance, nonfeasance, or malfeasance. https://suretyone.com/blog/public-official-bond-needed-newly-elected-public-officers/

Expand full comment
Edmund Clingan's avatar

Any stories about how DOGEd FEMA is handling the March storms that killed at least 39 and the April floods that have killed at least 19? Flooding the zone indeed.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

A distinct possibility.

Expand full comment
Niels Oleson's avatar

The ship is tipping hard. All hands opposite the mutinous captain and his mutineers!

Expand full comment
Ralph Averill's avatar

How many congressional Republicans got tipped-off about the 90 day relaxation of tariffs beforehand so they could jump in to a depressed market and ride it up?

Expand full comment
Kathleen Fernandez's avatar

According to HCR this morning, AOC is asking the same question. Congress members' financial reports are due May 15.

Expand full comment
Ralph Averill's avatar

“Congress members' financial reports are due May 15.”

How many of those report will be submitted with fingers crossed?

If the SEC hasn’t been gutted by DOGE yet, it doubtless will be soon.

Expand full comment
A View from Europe's avatar

Not a single decision taken so far by the Trump administration has been thought through for possible adverse consequences. The "Reciprocal Tariff" board was probably the most conspicuous idiocy, but the list is much too long to start to enumerate here. Very worrying is that so far I read little comment on the risk to the US and the rest of the world of a long term sell down of US Treasuries ($800Bn in Chinese hands and rising), and almost no mention of the catastrophically low US private savings ratio.

Expand full comment
Piotr Szafranski's avatar

Accidentally the EU couple of weeks ago loudly broadcasted a plan to issue extra 800B debt to cover it's crash defense program. So the money withdrawn from US bond market can be safely and orderly moved to EU. This means billions in profit for EU in lower borrowing costs and probably eases the mood of investors.

It is hard to monitor simultaneously what is going on in European countries, but at least in Poland the government is traveling the country with an open checkbook, visiting one manufacturing or research association after another. The checks are sandwiched with abolition of regulations at a large scale, meaning a fast decision-to-breaking-ground cycle. That deregulation is now an official EU program, again meaning that investment money can be soaked in quite fast.

I do not think above EU actions were intentionally timed for the US period of nausea, but the accidental fit came handy.

Expand full comment
Karen Gutfeld's avatar

No, I think it's all been thought through. Project 2025 is pretty detailed. The risk and chaos is deliberate.

Expand full comment
A View from Europe's avatar

You may be right Karen, but to me "reptile brain" ("The Economist") looks all too kind - gnat brain would be closer to the truth. I am even getting concerned that the gant brain is disfunctional.

Expand full comment
Arent's avatar

In this age of strongmen, politics are ruled by sentiments. Like current US economic policy, Brexit was founded on a hoax. There's no money to be found in leaving a very profitable, economic union. No matter what you put on the side of a bus. Just as with the UK, the notion that the USA are a special country, with its manifest Destiny's, needs to be left. 'God bless America', indeed, but what about the rest of the world?

Expand full comment
J. P. Dwyer's avatar

Watch the film MARGIN CALL to see a dramatized version of what trading rooms looked like this past week. Jeremy Iron's character tells the conference room full of subordinates that the way to survive is to "Be first, be smarter or cheat.." so they proceed to crash the market first to have enough cash at the end of the day to remain in the game. Sound familiar?

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Heaven helped the people trading on margin.

I would love to have heard the conversation between Trump and the groveling Tim Cooke.

Expand full comment
Mohan Raj's avatar

This bunch of clowns don't know what game the US has been playing all these years.

Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries brought about a blockade on Qatar in 2017 thinking they would kneecap the country's economy. Qatar is now more independent and Qatari businesses have flourished as a result.

The USA benefitted enormously in the aftermath of WW2 by simply being the guarantor of any business between any two parties across the world. Now, my guess is, the EU would carry that mantle. This gives an opening for the UK as well (after their Brexit fiasco). China would have been the natural successor, but its aggressive posturing defeats itself in the larger scheme of things.

Expand full comment
Jim Burgunder's avatar

I live in Switzerland and when you say „it ain‘t America“ they respond that Trump‘s corruption is also America and that I am deluded by the sense of moral superiority of American elites.

Painful, but I cannot refute this statement until there is a sustained institutional change in American conduct.

Expand full comment
Lana Foley's avatar

I think that is partially true in the sense of all of the citizens supporting this craziness

Expand full comment
Tyler P. Harwell's avatar

Clearly Trump has lots of enablers. And is nothing without them.

Expand full comment
Marcel's avatar

Aah… With this administration, price-relevant decisions are conspicuously often made over the weekend when the stock markets are closed. This was already the case during Trump's first term in office. Go long quickly on Friday - and reap huge profits on Monday...?

Expand full comment
Sb's avatar

The stench is indeed putrid, while the global human suffering infinite. What criminals…

Expand full comment