616 Comments
User's avatar
Scott Helmers's avatar

It is amazing and amusing to witness all the Republican politicians "hitching their wagons" to Trump. They parrot Trump's words and entirely endorse his "negotiating." One might think they would be a bit cautious and circumspect, but in fact, those left in the Republican Party have long since sacrificed all honor, intelligence, and shame. It would be comical, were it not so serious for the country. In my state of Iowa they are Reynolds, Ernst, Grassley, and in my district a man named Feenstra. What incredibly fatuous fools.

Expand full comment
Stephen Brady's avatar

In a rational world, they would take one look at what tRump said he wanted to do with the economy and run screaming in the other direction. But, nooooooo... they hitch their wagons to a man who bankrupted casinos (pleural) in Atlantic City... an Orange idiot who teetered on the edge of insolvency for many years until he finally stuck his money siphon into the US presidency. We are simply f****d!

Expand full comment
Joseph Zeigler's avatar

The records show the Russians saved his finances since 1987 when he was recruited.

Expand full comment
Michele Rasor's avatar

Yes, and he is very clearly doing their bidding. One aim is to destroy as much of the economies of US and allies as he possibly can, while profiting from it (his own perogative). It is the only way any of this makes sense. Expect more mayhem. Where it ends no one can tell. I suspect there will be violence this summer. This is America, after all.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 4
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Manohar's avatar

Seeing as there's a Bipartisan Senate committee report confirming Russian interference in favor of Trump readily available, its true madness to deny this reality. Try googling and reading it.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 4
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Manohar's avatar

The January 6th attempted insurrection wasn’t as bad as a bipartisan senate committee providing detailed publicly available evidence about Russia’s involvement in getting Trump elected?

This is why it’s a cult. Like Twain says, no amount of evidence will convince an Idiot. You’ve been dismissed. Seek help.

Expand full comment
NSAlito's avatar

HRC just won the popular vote and not the Electoral College, that's all.

Expand full comment
Elyse Fradkin's avatar

The KGB had notes on him going back to 1971.

Expand full comment
Katherine Boyd's avatar

This is not a conspiracy theory. Russians “turned” Trump in the 1980s when they were recruiting young rich Americans looking to achieve greater wealth and power. There is plenty of evidence of this.

Expand full comment
m droy's avatar

doh - what can i say. Has the whole western media suddenly become so pro-Trump that they won't report on a story like this? Maybe they are all bought. That would explain it. Bought by Trump or the Russians.

Maybe that explains why they have been so consistently kind to Trump and er....

well maybe not

Expand full comment
Richard Goutal's avatar

But how else can it be explained in a rational way?

Expand full comment
Doug R's avatar

Willful ignorant shitposting is no way to go through life. But it's not "ignorance" if you're getting paid to say it I suppose.

Expand full comment
m droy's avatar
User was temporarily suspended for this comment. Show
Expand full comment
Michele Rasor's avatar

If it walks like a Russian asset, and it talks like a Russian asset, what the hell do you think it is, a duck? You are putting two and two together and getting a zebra. He has been a Russian asset since at least 87. He and his kids have all admitted taking money from the Russians. But, hey, keep telling yourself fairy tales. Sure, they must be true if state media tells you so. Lol.

Expand full comment
Made Simple for MAGA's avatar

Explaining Trump's presidencies is simple: stupidity, misogyny, and racism, not necessarily in that order.

Expand full comment
Chris's avatar

The GOP's a cult that's gotten to where they are partly by always sticking together and never falling apart. No matter how fucked up things get, largely due to their own efforts, they figure, nothing REALLY bad will ever happen to any of them, because they're all part of the same power elite. And the more bridges they burn, the more tightly bound together they are.

Right now, Trump is the president of that club, and that means they do whatever he says.

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

I disagree. The GOP fell apart when the magas finally realized that the Republicans were a bunch of rich guys who sold them social issues and gave them policies that didn't bring the social changes they sought. After Iraq and 2008 they realized the GOP had screwed them royally and there was a grassroots takeover headed by the right wing talk show folks on radio and FOX.

Again the magas are getting screwed, but they're poorly educated ( there's become a strong anti-college bias among them) and are being taken for a ride by the talk show people, tech bros and Christian Nationalists.

Out of the pot and into the frying pan.

Expand full comment
Data Driven's avatar

At least in the rural PA region where I grew up, the anti-education, anti-college resentment was already well-entrenched by the early- to mid-1970s. Professor Hofstadter's, "Anti-intellectualism in American Life" was published in 1963. I subsequently found evidence of this in a descriptive history of the region published circa 1914.

Expand full comment
Michele Rasor's avatar

They have always been here, the Knownothings.

Expand full comment
Rex Page (Left Coast)'s avatar

Yes. And Trumpism is a religion. Suffering doesn’t diminish faith. Suffering strengthens faith. So people who think the MAGA base will abandon the felon because of hardships probably have overly optimistic expectations.

Expand full comment
Ellis Weiner's avatar

This. Hence, "cult." It will be interesting, and probably hair-raising, to see whom MAGA blames as Trump's/Musk's policies leave them poorer, sicker, and without gov't. services from SSA, FEMA, etc. A lot of them--probably millions--will be psychologically incapable of recognizing how they've been conned and betrayed.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

In a few months it will be clear who were simply tricked and who are so far gone they cannot be brought back to reality. I estimate at least 40 million of his supporters will require cult deprogramming.

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

We are but we don’t have to be.

Expand full comment
Potter's avatar

Astonishing how people close to Trump who still have power to resist keep capitulating, no they are abdicating, taking leave of their senses. We went ahead and gave Trump extraordinary destructive power, the MOST we have to give, power that has been building in the executive. We did, this democracy. We went ahead and let Trump run and win and get inaugurated instead of convicting him, slithery conman, criminal, madman, unstable, cruel, irresponsible. And now we, all of us, reap the results go round and round like caught mice. He says he could not care less ( about the people, about the Constitution, about the law) He could not care less, he said. "Fatuous fools" does not cover it.

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

There are number of people who are responsible for this shit show. Mitch McConnell, John Robert’s, Merrit Garland come to mind.

Expand full comment
Potter's avatar

Yes and voters...

Expand full comment
Victor Flores's avatar

Actually best point in the thread... it falls on the voters, and now it falls on us. We knew full well who we were electing.... like how many times did Trump say 'tariff' was the most beautiful word in the dictionary? So what are people protesting? .... that we got what we voted for?

Expand full comment
Chris Martin's avatar

IMO, Potter's point is that many voters actually *didn't* kmow what they were voting tor, which is why some MAGA voters have joined the protests.

Yes, Trump voters, and those Americans who sat out this election or threw their vote away by voting for a write-in or third party candiate absolutely *should* have known what they were going to get if Trump won, but many didn't.

Like Trump, MAGA voters are largely profoundly incurious. The fact over the past 35-40 years Republicans have created their own media echo chamer reinforces that lack of curiosity. They only need to turn on the TV to get "information" that supports their beliefs. If they've read any books lately they were all probably the "Killing of..." books by Bill O'Reilly. If Limbaugh were still inflicting himself on humanity, he'd probably be the only best selling right wing author who publishes "infotainment" books related to politics and government in any way.

That incuriousness (of which many MAGA voters are quite proud) leads to the IMO inescapable conclusion many of them don't want to know because they might accidentally learn something that forces them to question what they've believe, and why.

This is hardly unique to MAGA or even American voters, though. After UK voters passed Brexit, the next day there was a rather amazing spike in Google searches using variations of the question "What is Brexit?". After the 2024 US election, it seems reality may have somehow partially pierced the MAGA information bubble there was a spike in searches using terms like "Project 2025." Not sure if there was a specific search spike for "tariff" in November or late January or not.

Laatly, some of what we're seeing now is because until now, some voters were "Members of the Leopard Eating Faces Party." As a federal employee I'm thinking specifically of voters like that guy in Philadelphia who was absolutely stunned to learn Trump and Eoon's "deep state" and anti-federal employee nonsense applied to him too.

Expand full comment
Victor Flores's avatar

good explanation. i am angry tho. angry at people who fell for his con. and here we are.... him gambling with our savings (our = each person across the globe) .... nobody signed up for that.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

Mcconnell has been on an anti trump apology tour ever since Trump won. Think it finally sunk in that his lifes legacy will be the destruction of the entire nation. You did this Mitch. You could have stopped him and chose not to.

Expand full comment
Potter's avatar

It’s a mistake to blame one person. It’s astonishing how many let this happen. People were weak. Trump knew and took advantage. And he still does. People are weak fearful selfish and greedy. Not just MM, Who gave him power over and over for so long.?? The power seekers took over, took advantage. Trump had the magic.

Expand full comment
Chris Martin's avatar

I think what people like Andy are getting at is larger than just McConnell, it's the question, "You supported the far right fringe, which has led us to Trump and Tsar Elon. Exactly what did that get you?" Except for the 1%, the answer is either "Not much!" or "Nothing!"

IMO, this question is going to occupy the time of political scientists and historians for many years. Republican Senators like McConnell have been unwittingly been participating in their own demise for nearly 20 years. They not only let the far right fringe "out of the attic" where both major parties have traditionally kept their "lunatic" fringes, but embraced them to try to defeat, and then thwart the agenda of President Barack Obama in 2008.

The "easy" conclusion is that McConnell and Republican politicians made some of the same kind of calculations and mistakes interwar German politicians made in terms of their ability to control the Nazis. I'm not sure if that's the case, or if Republican politicians simply don't care, as long as they're able to remain figureheads and keep their jobs.

Expand full comment
Potter's avatar

It's about power in this partisan-run country. The United States has never been united ( except maybe during the world wars). The interests and ideas that brought the Civil War are still basically in operation. The GOP appealed to fears of the "lower class". Class is an issue here, supremacy of the rich and powerful, and being the "superior race" wanting to rule over the others. In the last decades trickle down economics was sold and bought even when it was demonstrably not working. The inequality grew. The blame game grew: it's immigrants, our open society, open borders, open trade. The GOP elite dug their heels in with trickle down and loved the ignorant that they worked on in so many ways. As they did this they blamed the "elites" on the other side..including the educated. Now they are MAGAs and are big time at it, against trade, education, social programs... not the government of all, but one where THEY should control ( and privatize)everything, destroying the government of the people, The rich get richer. Elon Musk is exhibit B, Trump exhibit A ( or vice versa) about how they believe businessmen must run the country, socialism and taxation is the enemy.

On the contrary McConnell joined this program and did well for himself.. unbelievably even when the people who put and kept him in position from GOP moderate to obstructionist as being a "conservative" changed and became a religion along with partisanship irregardless of what that advocated. How hard he worked to stay in power and to help bring us to (this moment). But it is much larger than McConnell who lost his principles if he had any or any worthy ones, along the way... the general story. Now it's a huge battle.. very huge... to get rid of this disease that is eating us, if we can. If you compare this to Nazi Germany then a war would be next. or what?

But no wonder the word "fascism" is now being used more easily now.

Expand full comment
Data Driven's avatar

"Let them eat cake" administration

Expand full comment
Potter's avatar

The problem is we are just awakening. The more they assault our system and lie to us more will get what is happening, the more will realize the seriousness of this and that it won’t just go away. Our system can’t take care of this while we go about our business. In fact we will be less able to ignore this and go about our business. The regime like cancer will grow. So now is the time for pushback before that cements and complacency sets in and people can only think about saving themselves from a sinking ship. There are a lot of people to get on board to believe this danger is upon us and happening. That’s the most important work now as I see it. We need the masses and to show that this is not partisan; something profound is happening.

Expand full comment
Potter's avatar

That means revolution… or it did.

Expand full comment
Data Driven's avatar

I'm not suggesting a revolution -- I am thinking of one of the authoritarian academic experts who studied how the Poles were able to build a coalition to push out their advancingly authoritarian administration. This expert said that it was important that the regime be shown to be smaller and less powerful than what they project.

I'm just an average citizen trying to participate in the much needed collective action to halt authoritarian creep or full blown takeover. Please suggest a better name or phrase that most will understand and can effectively define the current regime or attitude towards the constituency.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

Americans are soft now. If we somehow killed the internet for a month though and people no longer had their mental pacifiers, there would be a revolution.

Expand full comment
Potter's avatar

Before the internet there was TV but you could not carry it with you. There was radio and years of talk radio…Limbaugh et al. People don’t want to think deeply they are into quick emotional reactions and responses and being part of a group of people of similar ills. We have become oppositional and it seems vulnerable because of lack of education resentments greed … we lost our way., a good portion of us. Not everyone. This is the battle.

Expand full comment
Frau Katze's avatar

The standard MAGA line is that any troubles are just a “correction” from the Biden “disaster.” This way they can continue to blame Biden.

Expand full comment
Richard Collier's avatar

To your east in Pennsylvania we have “Fighting” John Fetterman, a Democrat who should be declared Missing In Action… or drowning in inaction!

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Depression has a variety of manifestations.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

Its not his fault brain damage turned him into a republican.

Expand full comment
Jim Jacobs's avatar

Right now they're the First Felon's tariffs but if the GOP Congress doesn't end them in a week, they'll be the Republican Tariffs. The GOP caucus could end the tariff madness by law and with the certain help of the Democratic caucus they would override a veto. At the same time they could stop and reverse injurious cuts to cancer, dementia and infectious disease research. The longer the GOP caucus delays taking action the more all of they will own the madness.

Expand full comment
Jo's avatar

Jim Jacob’s in my opinion is not that the GOP is delaying taking action, what is, is that the republican congress is content and purposely approving of everything and anything trump does. Like another post stated, trump is the leader of the GOP club. And these republicans in Congress bow and follow orders. Care nothing about the American People. They serve and work for their club leader and they are eager to be part of the dismantling of our country, they want power and enrichment. And could care less if it means stepping over each American.

Expand full comment
ira lechner's avatar

One would assume that every GOP MOC will get a hell of a bad time at the country club this weekend? Time is running out fast; better course correct no later than Monday and Tuesday!

Expand full comment
Cranmer, Charles's avatar

Yes, but there might be a silver lining. I am very hopeful that Trump's policies have been so insane and destructive that Representatives from the few competitive districts will start to abandon him. Once a few move, things in Washington could change so fast it will make your head spin.

Expand full comment
Potter's avatar

Yes that's the things have to get really bad first. Perhaps the silver lining is that this is not happening like the slow boiling of the frog, that people are aroused and stay aroused.

Expand full comment
Keith M Ellis's avatar

Something I don't see people talking much about is how Trump's history with people—including or especially his allies—will affect the course of things when the winds turn against him.

My mind keeps returning to Armando Iannucci's "Death of Stalin" and its depiction of the fate of Beria.

Expand full comment
Cranmer, Charles's avatar

Thanks for the reference to "Death of Stalin" (the greatest movie of the century so far.) I think that what is going on in Washington today is a replay. Obsequious, incompetent toadies pandering to a lunatic. The question is, who will be our Zhukov?

Expand full comment
Peter's avatar

I heard Rubio spouting nonsense this morning on NPR. He's in Brussells at a NATO FM meeting talking about how great the tariffs are. Even he knows how much of a lie it is but he has sold his soul to the Devil...forgetting what happened to Faust.

Expand full comment
El Ricardo's avatar

So true. You know he's lying because he said Trump is "absolutely right."

It was another diplomat, Talleyrand, who said, "All that is exagerrated is insignificant." Boy did he have Rubio's number.

Expand full comment
chris lemon's avatar

Rubio has no soul left to sell to the devil. Perhaps he's on to auctioning off his children or something now?

Expand full comment
Steelhead_Junkie's avatar

Never in a million years would I think I’d agree with Rand Paul, but he’s one of few Senate Republicans who spoke out against tariffs on Canada. It was a performative speech on the Senate floor and something Trump said he’d never sign, but it showed some Republicans are starting to shift.

Expand full comment
David Betts's avatar

Rep Ben Cline VA 6th district is my local fool. Most of what he posts on Facebook is outright lies. For Ben and his ilk, the oath they took to protect the constitution means less than nothing to them.

A theocratic state with a thin veneer of fake democracy would be just fine with these America haters.

Expand full comment
Mary Moody's avatar

Love the alliteration - fatuous fools!

Expand full comment
Lance Khrome's avatar

Government by destruction, what's not to like? And the GOPers remain convinced that the Great Unwashed firmly believe in all this self-inflicted carnage, and that to even timidly oppose tRump policies as a matter of simple sanity risks being "primaried", so keep the faith, nodding one's head like a bobblehead doll.

How much is too much? We're finding out real fast, right?

Expand full comment
Don Roszel's avatar

I agree that it is amazing. I do not agree that it is amusing. Frightening? Yes. Depressing? Yes. But, not amusing.

Expand full comment
Jim's avatar

Not amusing, but the only source of hope at the moment, namely that we may be saved from malevolence by incompetence once again. There was seemingly nothing standing in the way of their slowly continuing to impose a police state, but economic mismanagement just might prevent a full autocratic consolidation, if enough people get angry.

Expand full comment
Judith Auerbach's avatar

Hope springs eternal, Jim, but there an awful lot of people who won't give up. Just look at the recent Florida elections

Expand full comment
Susan Scheid's avatar

And to think there was a time, back when I was a union organizer in Iowa, when we had Senators like John Culver, Dick Clark and, later on, Tom Harkin. “In January of 1975, Iowa Democratic Party activists and office holders could not have been happier. In the previous November's mid-term elections, Iowans had elected or reelected five of the six Democratic candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives, including newcomers Michael Blouin, Berkley Bedell, and Tom Harkin. In addition, Democrats now controlled both branches of the state legislature. About the only thing for the state's Democrats to be unhappy about was the situation in the Iowa Executive Council, where the GOP controlled all seven offices (including that of governor). Even so, what probably excited loyal Democrats more than anything else was the election of former Second District Congressman John C. Culver to the United States Senate. The Culver election, coupled with the election two years earlier of Culver's legislative assistant Dick Clark over then-incumbent Sen. Jack Miller, marked only the second time in the state's history that two Democrats had been elected in the same decade to the highest legislative body in the nation. Iowa had finally become a competitive two-party state.”

Expand full comment
Data Driven's avatar

Anyone else concluding that this is the "Let them eat cake" administration of clowns?

Stuff like this is why all of my work colleagues in Argentina had US $$ "under their mattresses" and bank accounts in countries like Switzerland. They didn't want their liquid assets to be subject to the whims and incompetence of their governing regimes.

I needed cash to pay the entry visa when flying from Argentina to Chile and my Argentine colleague came in the next day and handed me several hundred USD for the visa! I don't carry that kind of cash even at home in the U.S.! This same colleague also showed me a framed 1,000,000 Argentine note from one of the country's bouts of severe inflation and currency devaluation -- he laughed and said he wanted to remind his kids that they used to be 'multi-millionaires'. Here WE are now.

Expand full comment
Miguel Muñoz's avatar

They’re not “hitching their wagons” to Trump, they’re being dragged by the shackles on their ankles. Trump has threatened primary challengers to any Republican who defies him. So there’s nothing amazing about their behavior.

If we didn’t have winner-take-all elections, an alternative conservative party would be able to challenge the Republicans.

Expand full comment
Data Driven's avatar

Personally, I no longer excuse or have sympathy for their situations. They 'signed up' for the role. They also swore an oath to the Constitution (not to their party or their seat) so it is time for them to put on their 'big-boy pants' and DO THEIR JOBS to defend the Constitution, the country, and those who live here.

We must hold our GOP electeds to account and push them to honor their oath to protect and defend the Constitution. Silence by any will be taken as consent.

Expand full comment
Miguel Muñoz's avatar

I agree completely. My point was simply that the "hitching their wagons" is a misleading metaphor. Hitching is a voluntary action. If we're going to figure out how to deal with this mess, we need to be very clear about player's motives. Trump is ruling by fear, and for now it's the elected Republicans who most afraid of him.

Expand full comment
Bruce Atwood's avatar

You may be right, but they may in fact agree with Trump. The polls how that an astounding number of Republican voters still agree with Trump on this one. You are correct in their oath, as a number of the GOP Congress know that Trump is disregarding it.

Expand full comment
Miguel Muñoz's avatar

Some of them obviously agree with Mr T. MTG comes to mind.

Expand full comment
Ycnay's avatar

I just can't resist. Is your district guy going to be "de-Feenstra-ted"???

Expand full comment
Bergen 2's avatar

Spineless sycophants, all of them.

Expand full comment
Gunnar Ehn's avatar

Chaos -is the inconceivable yet apparent objective leading to step by step autocratic power grab by the first kakistocracy in US history - totally contrary to the foundational principles embedded in the Constitution of the United States and the interest of its citizens.

Expand full comment
Susan Brown's avatar

While the economy is a significant global concern, I believe there is a more pressing, existential issue: the control and oversight of U.S. nuclear weapons.

I am concerned about several questions: Does the "Club" still exist? Is the U.S. still a member? Who has the authority to make decisions regarding nuclear weapons? What strategies are in place when potentially dangerous entities, such as North Korea, become capable? Will the policy become a fragmented, "every man for himself" approach?

These ill-considered tariffs could literally have deadly consequences. It is imperative that all NC members remain united to counter donald the dictator.

I urge you to listen to the Arms Control Wonk podcast featuring Aaron Stein and Jeffery Lewis for more insights

Expand full comment
Timothy Hanes's avatar

Also, now that Trump ended the world order, Poland, Germany, South Korea, Japan, and likely Mexico and Canada will get nuclear weapons. How do we deal with the worst crisis of nuclear proliferation imaginable?

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

I say these countries should move forth quickly as possible. They may be the only thing that will prevent nuclear holocaust.

Expand full comment
Doug S.'s avatar

Poland, South Korea, and Japan, yes. The others will probably be okay. (If Poland has nuclear weapons Germany won't need them because Poland is between Germany and Russia.)

Expand full comment
chris lemon's avatar

You left off Australia. It's highly likely that there's already an Australian/Japanese/Korea nuke program going, probably backed by U.K. expertise. Trump's attack on NATO and allies will lead to an incredibly dangerous situation where all first world countries have their own strategic nuclear forces.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

Thats the fun part. We don't!

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

I'm too scared to look in that direction.

Expand full comment
Barbara Beynon's avatar

Great musical coda!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 4
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

When you allow gerrymandering congressional districts, representatives no longer are beholding to their constituents. They don’t even need to attend their constituents’ town halls. And flush, there goes your democracy.

Expand full comment
EdgarsDad's avatar

History will ask how could so many smart people make such disastrous choice so effortlessly? The low information voter is not hard to understand but Wall Street and the CEO club obviously were willing to put everything at risk for a tax cut. That speaks to the degradation of our values over the last 50 years. When people stop considering how their choices might impact others its not going to end well.

In a well functioning Democracy Trump wouldn’t have been taken seriously as a candidate. He would have been convicted of tax fraud 20 years ago.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 4
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Larry Wonnacott's avatar

How's that MAGA hat lookin today? Find another group to annoy with your worthless comments

Expand full comment
Sandra Greer's avatar

Reported "hayduke" as a troll.

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

How is Scott’s comment maga?

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

SCOTUS never dealt with it. I’m not sure what Justice Kennedy said about it, but it was like, “It’s too hard to figure out.” So, balls and strikes. Right. Nobody would go to a baseball game where they made up the ‘rules’ as they go.

I’m a law and order guy. The torturers should have been locked up. The NYC finance guys should have been arrested. If NYC and NYS had done their job, Trump would have been a couple decades into a prison sentence. Democracy has rules and there have to be consequences for violating them.

Last, umpires are not just behind the plate. They are all over the field assuring the play is fair to all participants. You think that is our SCOTUS?

Expand full comment
Andrew Grossman's avatar

That’s rude. The writer is hardly a troll. And you may see clichés, I don’t.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Have you been rappelling your Jeep?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 4
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Timothy Hanes's avatar

Given how for you MAGAts every accusation is a confession and QAnon is basically an admission you are all Matt Gaetz-like creeps, I assume you spend a lot of time trying to figure out how people in middle school talk. Can’t wait to see your appearance on “To Catch A Predator”!

Expand full comment
Michele Rasor's avatar

Thats what I figured, Hayduke. What grade are you in?

Expand full comment
Arthur Lombardi's avatar

Same jerk as before, just different name. Go away. You're silly and boring.

Expand full comment
Dr. Fake Smile's avatar

Hey hayduke: more comments from an 8th grade incel

Expand full comment
Dr. Fake Smile's avatar

Hey hayduke: try something more than snark

Expand full comment
Dr. Fake Smile's avatar

Hey hayduke: it’s than not then

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

“Personally, I’m feeling very confident. That is, I have high confidence in predicting that we’re heading for multiple policy trade wrecks, inflicting damage like you’ve never seen before.”

Agreed, completely self inflicted wounds by a bunch of clowns with a chainsaw. And a clown with a chain saw, is still a clown with a chainsaw! Let that sink in!

Additionally, I truly feel bad for the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee. They definitely have their work cut out for them, and I’m not sure they even have any tools in their tool shed to deal with the gross level of incompetence displayed by this administration.

And congratulations to the “Confederacy of Dunces,” you’ve completely outdone yourselves this time around. I guess, nothing changes minds, until your pocket book gets mugged! And to the Murdock Family; you finally unleashed the FoxenStein monster, so glad you finally got it under control. IMHO!…:)

Expand full comment
mfwords's avatar

What’s fascinating (in a morbid way) is to watch the WSJ editorial page handle the idiotic “policy.” Everything was all good when they figured Trump would “just” unshackle anti corporate policies like supposedly restrictive “woke” ideas — you know, preventing poison from polluting the air and our food. Wall Street, stupid as ever, thought Trump would unleash the economy. They blindly believed, again, that they had an “in” on what he would do to make them rich. Now, twice in two months, they’ve been blindsided that the entire con was about Trump. It has ALWAYS been about Trump. If you want to know how the man ticks, just ask if he believes it will benefit him and hurt everyone else. He’s a bomb. He only hurts others. He thinks that’s what makes him powerful. The more pain, the better. And his clownish minions will enshrine him, possibly on the way to total ruin, because eventually, when they’ve voted to rescind their own constitutional power, no such power will soon exist. So when they’re broke, their families are broke, and in fact when they finally wake up and vote against him, their vote will be empty—just like their heads have always been. If there’s any mystery in all of this, it’s about the bottomlessness of Wall St., Murdock, and Congress’s collective stupidity. Trump was NEVER their man. And DOGE? The entire idea isn’t to deregulate. It’s to make the state have to contract with Elon, and to make anyone else who serves, serve only one man and one goal: to enrich the Clown and his Court Jester. This isn’t a government. It’s a protection racket. If you don’t kiss the ring you get nothing. Only even that isn’t going to work. In the very short term most of what makes the country functional will erode, and without trust around the world we will find ourselves in great danger of total isolation. Ask Russians how their economy is doing. That’s about the worst model you could choose. And, yes, it’s far worse than the Chinese one, which FUNDS education, FUNDS infrastructure, and FUNDS innovation. DOGE just made sure we’ll do none of the above, we’ll lose the tech race, the transformative race caused by infrastructure funding, and all of the power that funding education causes that you cannot foresee. In two months this man has managed to destroy America, all because of a congress so drunk with perceived power, they were willing to to vote against the will of every single man, woman, and child they represent and destroy each constituent’s future. If there are economists in the future (probably living abroad), they sure have a lot of material to work with.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Agreed, and well said. They all thought Trump was down for the count. Two legitimate court cases and indictments that would’ve left Trump in shackles. He leveraged his pain and legal woes, with promises of writing their own checks, if they give him their support, to get him back in the Oval.

They didn’t realize they made a pact with the devil, and once he regained power, he would use it as a cudgel and spare no one; including his clueless and morally bankrupt financial backers.

Oh the irony!…:)

Expand full comment
Linda Ann Robinson's avatar

RE: "If you want to know how the man ticks, just ask if he believes it will benefit him and hurt everyone else. He’s a bomb. He only hurts others. He thinks that’s what makes him powerful. The more pain, the better. "

I came to the same conclusion on January 6th!

What you have described in the quoted sentences above is a PSYCHOPATH... I guess you recognize that.

Expand full comment
Stephen Brady's avatar

In the end, though, tRump always shoots himself in the foot. He plunges into businesses and activities of which he has no understanding whatsoever. Look at his lengthy list of shuttered and bankrupted businesses... and scams.

Expand full comment
Timothy Hanes's avatar

Yeah but between his gun and his foot stand my children

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

I don’t think he needs to understand what he is doing, sowing chaos with a sleight of hand to gut taxpayer money is the plan.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Sounds like a Clint Eastwood movie. Just hide a stove door under your poncho and shoot everybody.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 4
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Richard Goutal's avatar

"DUMB" is the word that explains everything about this "administration"

Expand full comment
Gerald Rogan's avatar

"This isn’t a government. It’s a protection racket. If you don’t kiss the ring you get nothing." This has been the strategy of some Members of Congress for years. Pay for performance. Trump has taken our established "protection racket" to new heights. He owns a cryptocurrency. SCOTUS Justice Thomas should have his own too.

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

My daughter had a boyfriend who voted for Trump in 2020. He worked in finance in NY and they all thought he was a joke. No one listened to what Trump said because he'd say anything. They wanted him to make their taxes lower. The ex-boyfriend was shocked at Jan. 6th. We live in MAGA land and knew it wasn't a joke.

Expand full comment
Cheryl Lilienstein's avatar

Well put. This is ALL about extortion.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Toole's estate should profit in some fashion. Just who is being congratulated? If Republican politicians and constituents are the target of derision, we ought to make clear our meaning. COD, it fits and rolls off the tongue. GOP, while more evocative in a visual sense has little to do with today's republican party. Who put the CON in conservative?

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Agreed, and well said…:)

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 4
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Thanks for your input. Critiquing my comment with a rant, accomplishes nothing!…:)

Expand full comment
Sharlene Silva's avatar

It’s interesting that there was another “contributor” by a different name infesting this comment section last week. It was doing the same thing - dropping snotty, pointless “zingers”. I suspect an AI bot of some kind.

Expand full comment
Joyce B's avatar

I've reported this today, also suspecting bot.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

I’m not sure it’s a bot, since there are definitely a lot of trolls in the comment section. It’s all good though…:)

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

It's akin to burning a roadside billboard while hiding behind an alias.

Expand full comment
Dr. Fake Smile's avatar

Hey hayduke: snarking does nothing

Expand full comment
Dr. Fake Smile's avatar

Hey hayduke: snarky replies do nothing

Expand full comment
Dr. Fake Smile's avatar

Hey hayduke: making snarky comments does nothing

Expand full comment
Steelhead_Junkie's avatar

What does something? That’s where I struggle.

Expand full comment
Joseph Zeigler's avatar

Oh, suck it up!

Expand full comment
K M L's avatar

Great essay. I am so glad you left the NYT. They never would have let you write this excellent analysis of our current economic mess. The problem is....now what?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 4
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

A tad slow on the uptake, no?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 4
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

De rien

Expand full comment
hayduke's avatar
User was temporarily suspended for this comment. Show
Expand full comment
Dr. Fake Smile's avatar

Hey hayduke: your comments are nonsense

Expand full comment
Elyse Fradkin's avatar

Or you are. More likely you.

Expand full comment
Bob Anderhalt's avatar

I have a cynical idea about the Trump tariffs when they are implemented. A mid- to small-size country calls or visits Trump to get a reduced tariff for their country. Yes, they have to kiss the ring and say some nice things and praise Trump for being a financial genius but that isn’t enough. They will have to buy the Trump cryptocurrency or invest in some other Trump asset. If they don’t follow through on this commitment, the tariffs will return. I doubt that Trump can pull this off in the same way with any large EU country.

Expand full comment
M Q's avatar

I think that you hit the nail on the head. Trump is a classic mobster and this is a protection racket:

"Nice business/industry/economy you have there. It would be too bad is some extreme and unjustified tariffs should happen to it. But only I am able to protect you from those tariffs -- I just need a favor in return: a small investment in Trump cryptocurrency or Truth Social stock."

Technical note: those are both intangible items with little or no intrinsic value but are trading on public markets for orders of magnitude more than they are worth. Trump has billions of dollars worth of them, but cannot sell without the price collapsing ... unless there is a buyer somewhere who is also buying around the time that Trump is selling.

In other words, perfect vehicles for laundering money to Trump.

Expand full comment
Bob Anderhalt's avatar

Your technical note really hits the nail right on the head. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Mathias Risse's avatar

The EU acts as a block. They are going to give Trump a chance to negotiate during next 14 days. If he doesn't cooperate, the EU will do certain tariffs.

Expand full comment
John Gregory's avatar

But there are a lot of countries out there that would like to trade with the US that are not protected as part of the EU. Trump will take his personal payoffs from anyone who offers.

Expand full comment
Mathias Risse's avatar

There are hundreds of nations targeted by the tariffs. Does Trump want to negotiate with them all? He probably doesn't know most of them

Expand full comment
DrBDH's avatar

China already has partnered with Japan and South Korea, or rather they have partnered with China to coordinate reciprocal tariffs, etc. Can smaller Asian countries be far behind? China is already investing in Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia. An all-Asia Chinese economic empire will diminish America’s, for good or ill.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

We conceded that half of the planet to China last week.

Expand full comment
Jenn Borgesen's avatar

I like the Robert Reich suggestion that Canada and Japan join the EU in their tariff action.

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

I hope no country comes to kiss the ring of a con man. Stand up World.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

If he’s just talking his pocket then the little guys will be more than enough. May I suggest you are thinking too hard, or rather too long. Limit yourself to, say, ten words, then figure out what he’s doing. Call it “keeping with the realm of the possible.” If he’s successful in his wants, a longer discussion will not dissuade him.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

Its both a grift and a way to punish his enemies. Has nothing to do with economics.

Expand full comment
Jenn Borgesen's avatar

Oh, without a doubt. This is a big grift, a ploy to line the pockets of the orange one while grabbing resources he thinks he can get get at cut rate prices...cash for citizenship, rare earth minerals for 'protection' from the Russians at your door. Canada, give us your timber ... and yes we'll grab the grill from the mouths of penguins to feed the masses at home whose livelihoods he's destroyed ... Soyulent Green meet SuperKrill2025.

Expand full comment
FFortier's avatar

The USA became a big Tesla metaphor: you just can’t sell your products when everyone despises you.

Expand full comment
Mark Davis's avatar

You brought up a good word that will haunt America going forward: stupid. We’ve had the period of the ugly American, and the fat American, but we are deeply entrenched in the era of the stupid American. And unlike changing clothes or loosing weight, there’s no pill for stupid.

Expand full comment
Chris's avatar

Don't wanna be an American idiot

Don't want a nation under the new media

And can you hear the sound of hysteria?

The subliminal mindfuck America

Expand full comment
Ethereal fairy Natalie's avatar

🎯❤️Love Green Day. And that video.

Expand full comment
Joseph David Marsden's avatar

I expect that, as with everything else with this administration, the end result will be a system of extortion: if the 50% tariff on critical components for your industry is going to turn you unprofitable, just come to the White House to see if some accommodation can be arranged.

Bring your checkbook.

Expand full comment
John Gregory's avatar

Eric Trump basically said just that: don't be the last country to ask for special treatment...

Expand full comment
Joseph David Marsden's avatar

... and he misspelled "company."

Expand full comment
Meg Inwood's avatar

How do you misspell *company*, for the love of everything?!

Expand full comment
JesseBesse's avatar

He’s killed a lot of brain cells with his massive cocaine problem.

Expand full comment
Meg Inwood's avatar

I wonder if Central America could avoid tariffs by threatening to stop exporting blow to the US. It would cripple this administration!

Expand full comment
Jenn Borgesen's avatar

No sorry, no checks, no cash, it's a $trumpet bucks only window.

Expand full comment
Stephen Miller's avatar

Paranoia is often a sign of dementia. People with dementia often think friends and even relatives are ripping them off or trying to steal their money. We have a demented megalomaniac in the White House. He thinks all the countries in the world are ripping off the US, including islands with just penguins.

Expand full comment
Mohan Raj's avatar

This does not pass the smell test. The policies are not demented enough to include Russia.

Expand full comment
Stephen Miller's avatar

Good point. Trump wants to have a special relationship

with Russia, probably in the hope that he can build Trump hotels there.

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Actually, he already has a special relationship with Russia. Ever since getting the codename "Krasnov" back in the '70's.

Expand full comment
justin SG's avatar

Yes! Trump is a Russian asset whether he knows it or not.

If Trump KNOWS he is a Russian asset, that's EVIL.

If Trump DOESN'T KNOW he is a Russian asset, that's WORSE!

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

I maintain he's evil either way.

Expand full comment
justin SG's avatar

Absolutely Winston! EVIL and WORSE -> STUPID. Trump is the upper left peak on the Dunning-Kruger curve. 👇 When evil people are this stupid they are extremely dangerous because they can't be taught, but are easily manipulated by people like Putin...

https://bsky.app/profile/justinsg.bsky.social/post/3lgyra2gsl22b

Expand full comment
DrBDH's avatar

Russia is sanctioned up the wazoo, so no trade, no tariffs.

Expand full comment
stannius's avatar

Trade with Russia: Nearly zero

Trade with uninhabited islands: Actually zero

Expand full comment
justin SG's avatar

Oh not for long... Trump is working hard to remove those sanctions on Russia.

Expand full comment
JesseBesse's avatar

I just read an interview with the president of Finland where he had had a good meeting with Trump & he seemed certain that Trump would be imposing harsher sanctions on Russia…I had a bit of hope but the one consistent thing with Trump is his love of Russia.

Expand full comment
Mike Harkreader's avatar

Malignant stupidity.....Paul you do have a way with words.

Expand full comment
Jenn Borgesen's avatar

Hopefully the malignancy is self limiting ...

Expand full comment
Sean Laverty's avatar

Well, it can be difficult to discern precisely where malignancy ends and stupidity begins.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

Expand full comment
Jim Cossitt's avatar

Nails it:

What business can’t deal with is a regime under which trade policy reflects the Whims Of A Mad King, where nobody knows what tariffs will be next week, let alone over the next five years. Are these tariffs going to be permanent? Are they a negotiating ploy? The administration can’t even get its talking points straight, with top officials saying that tariffs aren’t up for negotiation only to be undercut by Trump a few hours later.

Expand full comment
Sean Laverty's avatar

2020: Recession begins due to global catastrophe. Trump unable to competently respond.

2025: Recession begins due to global catastrophe. Trump IS the catastrophe.

Expand full comment
Michael P's avatar

I think the deepest irony of all this is how Chinese this policy feels. Fire the central debt bazooka to fund intervention, run a massive deficit for two years, and regrow when you take your medicine.

Is that good? Probably not when your technocrats consist of the three stooges and seven dwarves

Expand full comment
Mohan Raj's avatar

More and more I follow American politics, the more and more I like the Chinese government. The Chinese seem to be more efficient and better at what the West is doing. Everything, really.

Incarcerating people, check; gaslighting and spreading fake news, check; suppressing real economic news, on the way - check; taking away human rights, check; trying to control the economy for the whims and fancy of a single person, check (the Chinese policies seem to at least favor them at all instances); and the list goes on...

Expand full comment
Michael P's avatar

Disagree, but it’s like a race to the bottom so only halfheartedly. My little brother is graduating college and I’m very glad he’s seeking a white collar job here and not China.

They don’t even publish youth unemployment anymore! That’s what you get when the real estate industry hires over half(!!!) of college graduates at its peak, then folds.

China itself can seemingly only fire the bazooka a couple more times. And its central debt looks a lot more appealing to collect than America’s

Expand full comment
Mohan Raj's avatar

I was being sarcastic, but I like your optimism - this s##t is better than the other.

Expand full comment
stupidfood's avatar

Trump and Musk learn from China, but what they did is worse than China. I have talked about that with my Chinese friend for a few months. It’s ridiculous and heartbroken.

Expand full comment
Mohan Raj's avatar

Agree. They all learn from each other.

Expand full comment
JesseBesse's avatar

Reading a book about that now- Autocracy Inc. Scary stuff.

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

Not Chinese per se, Mao-ish. He was a good revolutionary but a terrible administrator who was sure he knew everything. He killed millions of his own people with stupidity and arrogance.

I wouldn't want to live under Xi's rule, but he's a lot smarter than Trump. But no matter how you cut it, an absolute monarch isn't as good as a group of intelligent experts in many fields.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 4
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Dr. Fake Smile's avatar

Hayduke: you’re gibbering again

Expand full comment
Michael Roseman's avatar

Perfect song choice!

Expand full comment
Georges Jacquemart's avatar

We don't talk enough about the underlying thinking - I guess there is a little thinking going on -behind the tariffs, is that Trump and his friends want to replace income taxes with tariffs, replacing the internal revenue service with the external revenue service. What a gift that would be for the billionaires!

Expand full comment
justin SG's avatar

YES! The largest transfer of wealth from workers to billionaires EVER!

"LIBERATION DAY" is the day Kleptocracts celebrate liberating us from OUR money!

WAKE UP AMERICA!

Expand full comment
Sean Laverty's avatar

"Call me and we'll come to an arrangement."

This is the greatest grift of all time, isn't it?

"You're face. To face. With the man who scammed the world."

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

If so, that is a big tax raise for most Americans.

Expand full comment
Luigi Colucci's avatar

Really absurd! Just 3 months!!!

I am still asking myself what the “idea of a plan” on healthcare will be!

Expand full comment
GJ Loft ME CA FL IL NE CT MI's avatar

Earlier this week Musk announced that the DOGE boys will be replacing ALL of the SS systems within the next 4 months. As a programmer, analyst, architect and project leader, I have to say that this is even dumber than the tariffs. (And that's saying a lot).

There are white papers from the GAO to the Senate Finance Committee laying out the basic architecture and components of the SSA database and applications. The GAO gives high praise to the SSA for their systems but points out the need for changes.

Musk is an idiot who has no fucking clue what he is doing. Sure, a large portion of the SS recipients can survive a month or so without a check, but who is going to feed, house and clothe the millions that can't?

We all know it's not going to be Musk/Trump or the Republicans.

Expand full comment
stannius's avatar

I have worked under a tech "leader" reliving his glory days of hacking out a system in a weekend, who came into an established company and tried to rewrite the core software in a weekend too. At the end of the weekend he had a solution that was a squared Pareto - 64% (80% of 80%) of the functionality. The problem was, the real business value was somewhere in the missing 36%, but he had no idea where because he hadn't spent any time actually understanding the business.

Musk wants to replicate his similar "success" at Twitter, with the entire country. And he seems to think the entire Social Security Administration boils down to the tiny fraction (much less than 64%) that is central database of recipients.

Expand full comment
Sandra Greer's avatar

It generally takes months to write the design documents for a large system, and even then, there is a good chance you miss some of the business rules. "Managers" and "Leaders" think all of this is easy. They are people who move their lips when they read. And think they are geniuses with high IQ.

Expand full comment
Dominique BOISCLAIR's avatar

That SS system will be like the StarShip system: *boom* 8 minutes after launch! 😳

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

As the song says "On that you can rely".

Expand full comment
WinstonSmithLondonOceania's avatar

Pain and death - except for the wealthiest.

Edit: Oh yes, and cod liver oil.

Expand full comment
Sandra Greer's avatar

It was "concept of a plan" and he didn't have one of those either. We keep giving him credit for brains he doesn't have.

Expand full comment
Al Keim's avatar

Luigi, considering healthcare's role in our economy - bigly. As the professor has indicated we are in for a very difficult period. A graph Healthcare/GDP or better Healthcare/Industrial production would be informative. Adjusted for time and nation such a graph might offer substantial insights.

Expand full comment
Luigi Colucci's avatar

Yes, thanks

Expand full comment
Jane D's avatar

Trump has no clue about the geopolitical climate. He has no clue about anything. Everything he does is knee-jerk. Not the best way to run a country or at all. Yesterday was brutal, and today is warming up for another repeat. When are they gonna invoke the 25th?

Expand full comment
JoanC's avatar

The answer to your question is never, unless Dems retake both houses of Congress in the midterms with sufficient majorities to either invoke the 25th and make it stick, or impeach him and make it stick this time. Hopefully the utter wreckage of government institutions we rely on, plus much higher prices, a tanked economy and a recession, will wake voters up, but I'm not holding my breath.

Expand full comment
Mary Moody's avatar

Sadly the entire Republican Congress and administration would have to be impeached as well - the next in lines would be just as bad and controlled by the shadow of Trump!

Expand full comment
Somewhere, Somehow's avatar

I disagree. I think he is implementing what Putin and oligarchs want. He will be discarded once they are satisfied.

Expand full comment
Jane D's avatar

you are correct. He is whatever a figurehead is supposed to be. All he’s required to do is sign stupid executive orders, which amount to nothing, eat cheeseburgers, and play golf and cheat, of course

Expand full comment